Machine Learning to Promote Sustainability 

Company analysis based on expert interviews

JournalIndustry 4.0 Science
Issue Volume 41, Edition 4, Pages 44-51
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

This article outlines the results of ten expert interviews on the use of machine learning to promote corporate sustainability and then compares them with relevant literature. The study shows that economic factors drive the use of machine learning, the introduction of which is initiated by both top management and specialist departments. However, grounded strategies for implementing machine learning are rarely available and use cases are often based on supervised learning. The environmental impact (the reduction of emissions, for example) outweighs the social impact, though quantification is difficult. Additionally, a lack of trust, expertise, and communication hinders the adoption of machine learning, while some technical challenges regarding data requirements also pose problems.

Keywords

Article

Climate change is threatening both the Earth and its population, with a global warming of 1.5°C predicted to lead to extreme environmental conditions [1]. Without proactive measures, the needs of future generations will inevitably be jeopardized [2]. Digitalization measures are often presented as a potential tool to counter this development. Artificial intelligence, especially the subfield of machine learning, can improve sustainability efforts, for example by analyzing data and making decision forecasts [3]. Machine learning thereby has the potential to assist in reducing pollution, improving healthcare, and promoting equality. Nevertheless, the technology carries numerous risks due to potential miscalculations [4]. 

This study addresses the question: “How is machine learning used to promote environmental and social sustainability components in companies?” The interviews provide insight into strategies for introducing machine learning, outline use cases in companies and their impact on environmental and social sustainability, and propose existing opportunities and challenges related to the technology and its impact on sustainability.

Increased corporate responsibility for sustainability 

In the Brundtland Report, the United Nations defines sustainability as the principle of meeting the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs [5]. This definition was expanded in Agenda 21 to determine  three (equally important) dimensions of sustainability: social, ecological, and economic [6]. 

To hold companies accountable for their environmental and social responsibility, the European Union adopted the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) [7] and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) [8]. As a result, companies are obliged to integrate ecological, social, and economic aspects into their corporate strategy and daily operations [9]. The aim of this study is to discuss how machine learning can contribute to this process. 

Forms of artificial intelligence

Machine learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI) in which computer agents can improve themselves based on data. With the goal of extracting information from a system, algorithms are used to recognize patterns, make predictions, and support decision-making processes [10]. 

In a supervised learning environment, algorithms are trained with labeled data and then validated with test data [11]. Regression (prediction of values through function approximation [12]) and classification (categorical assignment [13]) are based on supervised learning. Support vector machines and k-nearest neighbor algorithms [14] are suitable for both regression and classification. K-nearest neighbor is used in computer vision with the aim of analyzing and understanding visual scenes from the real world [15]. 

In an unsupervised learning environment, algorithms work with unlabeled data, often for clustering. A common method is K-means clustering [16]. Reinforcement learning is based on a reward-punishment principle for computer agents, which is often modeled using the Markov decision process (MDP) [17]. Deep learning uses neural networks to process large amounts of data with minimal preprocessing [16]. Neural networks are used, among other things, in natural language processing (NLP), which recognizes, understands, and generates human language [18]. Machine learning is often implemented as part of the CRISP-DM process, which provides a structured approach to data mining [19].

Description of the interview sample

The research results [20] are collected in ten exploratory qualitative expert interviews. The interviews are intended to close the research gap identified in a prior literature review. The experts are sustainability managers, AI project managers, machine learning developers, and executives from the automotive industry, the energy sector, the IT industry, and management consulting. The experts work in both small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large corporations and are all male. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. The qualitative content analysis is carried out using a deductive-inductive approach [21].

Leveraging machine learning to promote corporate sustainability 

The interviews [20] show that implementing machine learning in companies is predominantly economically motivated. Nevertheless, the interview participants emphasize that ecology is part of their companies’ business plans and is integrated into corporate strategy. In any case, ecological improvements made via the use of machine learning often also drive economic potential (for example through resource savings). Only one expert cites the social driver of improving the working environment. Regulatory frameworks are also driving companies to implement machine learning use cases to meet requirements with less effort.

In SMEs, management initiates the introduction of machine learning by discussing possible solutions with machine learning providers. Experts report that employees in some SMEs do not have the necessary knowledge to assess the potential of machine learning in their field. In addition, time capacities are limited. Top-down initiatives are therefore predominant in SMEs. In larger companies, both top-down and bottom-up initiatives can be observed. According to experts, bottom-up initiatives require a promoter who drives action by forming networks between motivated employees.

The experts agree that the introduction of machine learning use cases to promote sustainability can be optimized through a mature machine learning strategy. However, the companies using machine learning often lack such comprehensive strategies. As a rule, machine learning solution providers carry out a proof-of-concept and implement a prototype solution within the company, which represents a step on from a pure feasibility study toward practical implementation. This process, based on information from the experts surveyed, is shown in Figure 1

Figure 1: Proof of concept (black) and prototype implementation (gray).
Figure 1: Proof of concept (black) and prototype implementation (gray).

In the first step of the process, the existing challenges to be addressed with machine learning are analyzed and the requirements defined. Understanding the data is an important step before selecting an algorithm. This step is followed by data collection and data preparation. Prototypes are usually trained with a public data set to avoid data leaks. After successful testing, the prototype is integrated into the customer’s system. Its functionality is demonstrated in real time with safety buffers. The customer’s management makes the implementation decision depending on functionality, costs, trust, and the current market situation. After commissioning, the prototype is expanded in iterative steps. 

Relevant use cases 

The experts [20] describe 15 machine learning use cases that contribute to corporate sustainability. One specific use case focuses on predicting electricity consumption and generation. In this case, a neural network-based application by an energy supplier ensures the electricity supply to private households. The use of machine learning is particularly important here in view of the fluctuating generation from renewable energy sources. Other use cases include detecting pest infestations in forests, controlling cooling pumps, and automatically processing requests for sustainability data in supply chains.

The use cases described are based on supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, with supervised learning being the most prominent. Some experts were unable to provide details on algorithms. The most common methods in the context of sustainability are classification and regression. An overview of all use cases with their corresponding machine learning methods is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Use cases and machine learning methods used. 
Figure 2: Use cases and machine learning methods used. 

Impact of machine learning use cases on sustainability 

The expert survey [20] outlines largely positive effects of machine learning on corporate sustainability. However, most experts find these difficult to quantify. The use cases examined reduce material consumption by reducing packaging material, waste material, and the need for replacement parts. In addition, electricity consumption can be reduced by up to 30%, which reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Two use cases promote biodiversity by protecting the ecosystem. In the social dimension, employee safety and motivation increase in the use cases. Overall, however, ecological effects outweigh social effects. 

That said, machine learning also negatively impacts sustainability, as algorithms run on hardware made from precious metals and require electrical energy. Some experts emphasize the high-power consumption for training, while others claim that the energy consumed in training and operating the algorithm is negligible. Negative effects on a social dimension were not mentioned in the interviews. According to experts, meaningful metrics that go beyond greenhouse gas emissions are needed to quantify the positive effects of artificial intelligence on sustainability.

Opportunities and challenges in the use of machine learning

The experts surveyed [20] observe that most staff trust machine learning technology. Only older employees can sometimes approach it with skepticism, which is reinforced by the lack of transparency in the model results and questionable data security. Without financial support programs, proof-of-concepts often exceed the available funds. Only rarely is it investigated how existing data could be used profitably, which is often due to poor communication within the organization. This results in an unstructured database with poor data quality.

AI as a Service offers hope for a more efficient implementation, especially for companies with limited expertise and capacity. Centralizing computing power in data centers and optimizing algorithms could also potentially reduce energy consumption in the future. Machine learning could potentially inform interactions between different sustainability dimensions, thereby supporting the selection of suitable sustainability measures.

Findings and critical assessment

Literature often describes the IT department as the primary driver behind the introduction of machine learning [22], although, according to expert interviews, it is usually management that takes on this role, at least in SMEs. The literature also shows that machine learning strategies should involve all employees, which is rarely the case, despite the positive impact it has on implementation [23]. 

Both the literature and the interviews agree that a mature machine learning strategy has a particularly strong influence on successful implementation. Such a strategy contributes to transparency and communication, thereby reducing internal resistance. The experts surveyed outline a practice-oriented, iterative development process reminiscent of CRISP-DM [19]. In the literature, such process descriptions tend to omit decision-making on machine learning-based sustainability measures. 

Use cases from literature come from the fields of energy, water, biodiversity, transportation, smart cities, health, and climate change. Internal company use cases are poorly documented, presumably for reasons of confidentiality. Internal company and scientific use cases overlap in the categories of energy and biodiversity but in hardly any other categories—possibly due to the focus of the interviews on economically driven organizations. 

Supervised learning dominates in both practice and literature [24], while unsupervised or reinforcement learning has hardly been used to date. This may be because the results of unsupervised and reinforcement learning are less transparent than those of supervised learning, which is in line with the skepticism expressed by employees regarding the model results [20]. Consequently, further efforts are needed to harness both forms of machine learning in promoting sustainability. 

Classification, regression, neural networks, computer vision, and NLP are methods that are frequently used in both literature and practice. These methods appear to be particularly relevant in the context of sustainability. However, some experts were unable to provide technical details, so a more technology-focused sample could provide further insight.

The literature emphasizes both positive (for example emission reduction and health promotion) and negative effects of machine learning (for example energy-intensive training and discrimination due to biased data). The literature calls for energy-efficient hardware and less computationally intensive models. This optimization of hardware and software is intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions [25]. In the interviews, the focus is clearly on positive ecological impacts, especially emission reduction, while social potential remains largely untapped. As a first step, organizations could investigate using machine learning to improve working conditions. 

When compared to the literature, the experts surveyed classify the negative ecological effects of training as less drastic, despite some disagreement. This can be explained by the varying degrees of complexity of the models used. Many of the models identified can be trained on standard hardware, which is why some assume a lower energy intensity. However, there are other models that require a higher computing capacity [20]. 

The literature sees quantifying the impact of machine learning on sustainability as a challenge [3] due to a lack of defined goals [26]. The experts surveyed see the challenge in the lack of suitable metrics. The development of suitable metrics therefore represents a further area for research.   

Expert interviews and literature identify similar challenges: mistrust among older employees, data protection concerns, financial constraints, lack of knowledge, and a high degree of individualization [20, 27]. In addition, there are structural challenges such as a lack of overarching machine learning strategies and silo-like organizational structures. The resulting communication problems between IT and specialist departments make implementation difficult due to misunderstandings regarding the objectives and feasibility of machine learning use. These structural challenges often result in pilot projects without long-term scaling prospects. 

Surveys show that 71% of companies in the manufacturing sector are already implementing initiatives to develop skills and mitigate concerns [28]. However, to have a lasting impact, these initiatives need to be strategically embedded in comprehensive transformation processes. Service models could reduce technical implementation barriers in the future if a clearly defined strategy with measurable goals is defined.

The importance of long-term, strategic integration 

The results of the study show that, in practice, the potential of machine learning for promoting sustainability has not yet been realized, despite a strong will to do so. Companies should initiate machine learning to promote sustainability in a targeted manner, develop comprehensive machine learning strategies, foster skill acquisition, and address the problems with measurability surrounding the impact of machine learning on sustainability. Where existing capacity bottlenecks exist, companies should begin by raising employee awareness of sustainability and machine learning. 

In line with CRISP-DM, further steps should include defining goals through specialist departments, reviewing and structuring the data pool together with IT, and identifying possible use cases [19]. The opportunity to use machine learning specifically for a holistic sustainability transformation is within reach if the technological, organizational, and cultural prerequisites are developed in the long term. Short-term implementation of machine learning to promote sustainability is usually not successful without strategic integration. 

The authors would like to thank the Hessian Ministry of Science and Research, Arts and Culture for its financial support of the research project „LOEWE-Transfer-Professur“ (funding code: LOEWE/4TP/519/05/02.002(0002)/108).


Bibliography

[1] Badr, A.; El-Shazly, H.: Climate change and biodiversity loss: Interconnected Challenges and Priority measures. In: Catrina: The International Journal of Environmental Sciences 29 (2024) 1, pp. 69-78.
[2] Masson-Delmotte, V.; Pörtner, H.; et al.: Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten: 1,5 °C Globale Erwärmung. Geneva 2018.
[3] Nishant, R.; Kennedy, M.; Corbett, J.: Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. In: International Journal of Information Management 53 (2020).
[4] European Commission: Mitteilung der Kommission an das Europäische Parlament, den Rat, den Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschuss und den Ausschuss der Regionen: Förderung eines europäischen Konzepts für künstliche Intelligenz. Brussels, April 21, 2021.
[5] United Nations: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. 1987.
[6] United Nations: Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro, June 1, 1992.
[7] Ozen, O.; Nagel, L.; et al.: Addressing scope 3 categories for carbon accounting through a use-case at a scientific institute with a real production line. In: GCSM. Ho Chi Minh City 2024.
[8] European Commission: Richtlinie des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Sorgfaltspflichten von Unternehmen im Hinblick auf Nachhaltigkeit und zur Änderung der Richtlinie (EU) 2019/1937. Brussels, February 23, 2022.
[9] OECD: Corporate Sustainability. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/corporate-sustainability.html#:~:text=Corporate%20sustainability%20entails%20integrating%20environmental,long%2Dterm%20risks%20and%20opportunities, accessed 29.04.2025.
[10] Manning, C.: Artificial Intelligence Definitions. Stanford 2020.
[11] Buxmann, P.; Schmidt, H.: Grundlagen der Künstlichen Intelligenz und des Maschinellen Lernens. In: Buxmann, P.; Schmidt, H. (eds.): Künstliche Intelligenz: Mit Algorithmen zum wirtschaftlichen Erfolg (2019), pp. 3-17.
[12] Alpaydin, E.: Maschinelles Lernen. Berlin Boston 2019.
[13] Murphy, K.: Machine learning: A probabilistic perspective. Cambridge 2012.
[14] Anwar, A.; Ghany, K.; et al.: Human Ear Recognition Using Geometrical Features Extraction. In: Procedia Computer Science 65 (2015), pp. 529-537.
[15] Klette, R.: Concise Computer Vision: An Introduction into Theory and Algorithms. London 2014.
[16] Brynjolfsson, E.; McAfee, A.: The Business of Artificial Intelligence. URL: https://hbr.org/2017/07/the-business-of-artificial-intelligence, accessed 28.04.2025.
[17] Sutton, R.; Barto, A.: Reinforcement learning: An introduction, Cambridge London 2020.
[18] Kurdi, M.: Natural language processing and computational linguistics: Speech, Morphology and Syntax. London New York 2016.
[19] Shearer, C.: The CRISP-DM model: the new blueprint for data mining. In: Journal of Data Warehousing 5 (2000) 4, pp. 13-22.
[20] Bode, N.: Interview Transcripts: Driving Corporate Sustainability Through Artificial Intelligence. URL: https://doi.org/10.48328/tudatalib-1486, accessed 02.05.2025.
[21] Schreier, M.: Varianten qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse: Ein Wegweiser im Dickicht der Begrifflichkeiten. In: Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung 15 (2014), pp. 27-50.
[22] Geretshuber, D.; Reese, H.: Künstliche Intelligenz in Unternehmen: Eine Befragung von 500 Entscheidern deutscher Unternehmen zum Status quo – mit Bewertungen und Handlungsoptionen von PwC. 2019.
[23] Cisco. Cisco-Umfrage: 42 Prozent der deutschen Firmen nutzen bereits KI. URL: https://news-blogs.cisco.com/emea/de/2023/10/19/cisco-umfrage-42-prozent-der-deutschen-firmen-nutzen-bereits-ki/, accessed 02.05.2025.
[24] Kar, A.; Choudhary, S.; et al.: How can artificial intelligence impact sustainability: A systematic literature review. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 376 (2022).
[25] Bolte, L.; Vandemeulebroucke, T.; et al.: From an Ethics of Carefulness to an Ethics of Desirability: Going Beyond Current Ethics Approaches to Sustainable AI. In: Sustainability 14 (2022) 4472.
[26] Crawford, K.; Whittaker, M.: The AI Now Report: The Social and Economic Implications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Near Term. 2016.
[27] Rammer, C.: Herausforderungen beim Einsatz von Künstlicher Intelligenz: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von jungen und mittelständischen Unternehmen in Deutschland. Berlin 2021.
[28] Lane, M.; Williams, M.; Broecke, S.: The impact of AI on the workplace: Main findings from the OECD AI surveys of employers and workers. In: OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 288. Paris 2023.

Your downloads


Potentials: Business Models Dynamics Energy Efficiency

You might also be interested in

Serious Gaming and the Energy Transition

Serious Gaming and the Energy Transition

Collaborative knowledge generation and interactive understanding of complex interrelationships
Janine Gondolf ORCID Icon, Gert Mehlmann, Jörn Hartung, Bernd Schweinshaut, Anne Bauer
Conveying the complexity and multifaceted nature of the energy transition to a broad audience is a challenge. This article demonstrates how interactive serious games on a multitouch table can help make connections tangible and comprehensible. The games and the table were used in various conversational contexts. These are presented here in three case vignettes based on participant observation of the different applications, as well as situated and shared reflection. The vignettes demonstrate how interaction can trigger epistemic processes, enable shifts in perspective, and foster collective thinking, all of which are necessary for shaping the future of society as a whole.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 62-69
Industrial Transformation via a Machining Learning Factory

Industrial Transformation via a Machining Learning Factory

A learning module to foster competencies for a sustainability-driven transformation
Oskay Ozen ORCID Icon, Victoria Breidling ORCID Icon, Stefan Seyfried ORCID Icon, Matthias Weigold
Sustainability-enhancing transformation processes are necessary in all sectors if we are to remain within planetary boundaries. This also applies to the industrial sector as a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. Employees need new competencies to master this complex task of industrial transformation. These range from CO2 equivalents accounting to the development and evaluation of transformation scenarios, including technical measures. The learning module developed here addresses these competency requirements and uses the example of the ETA factory to show how a competency-oriented learning module for industrial transformation can be structured. It essentially comprises four phases: data collection and CO2 equivalents accounting, cause analysis, development of measures and evaluation of measures.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | Edition 2 | Pages 38-47 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.2.38
Has the Time Come for an Energy Revolution in Intralogistics?

Has the Time Come for an Energy Revolution in Intralogistics?

The current status of hydrogen fuel cell-powered MHE
Gustav Bösehans, Joseph W. Dörmann
Hydrogen fuel cells promise to be a sustainable alternative to fossil fuel or battery-electric material handling equipment (MHE) in various production or warehouse contexts. Short refuelling times, an absence of carbon emissions, and constant power input put fuel cell-powered MHE at an advantage in high-intensity work environments. However, various barriers to the adoption of fuel cells remain, including considerations surrounding cost and efficiency.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 41 | 2025 | Edition 6 | Pages 74-80
Loam Construction and Wooden Shelving

Loam Construction and Wooden Shelving

A contribution to sustainability in warehouse logistics
Viviano De Giacomo ORCID Icon, Nathalie Fritsch ORCID Icon, Jakob Kennert ORCID Icon, Dieter Uckelmann ORCID Icon
This study examines the contribution of natural building materials, in particular loam and wood, to the sustainable development of logistics infrastructure, assessing ecological, economic, and technical dimensions across the entire life cycle. Potentials, restrictions, and supportive framework conditions are identified based on literature analyses and expert interviews. Wood proves to be technically mature and ecologically advantageous, especially in high rack construction, while loam offers high potential for energy- and resource-efficient construction. The study concludes with recommendations for research, policy, and practice to establish circular construction methods in logistics.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 41 | Edition 6 | Pages 82-89
The Bias of “Instructional Systems for the Disabled”

The Bias of “Instructional Systems for the Disabled”

Ethnographic insights from deploying augmented reality in a sheltered workshop
David Kostolani ORCID Icon, Annemarie Ploss, Sebastian Schlund ORCID Icon
The rehumanization of industrial work has emerged as a key focus in Industry 4.0 research, emphasizing the empowerment of human workers amidst advancing automation. Within this re-search, supporting workers with disabilities through digital assistance technologies serves as a prime example of a human-centric approach to industrial engineering. These technologies often claim to enhance productivity, which aims to promote the integration of workers with disabili-ties in industrial roles. But can they genuinely improve their work experience? This ethnograph-ic study presents insights from two years of developing and deploying augmented reality in a sheltered woodworking workshop. Over this period, we engaged in conversations and facilitat-ed over 30 technology sessions with workers with diverse disabilities. Our experiences chal-lenge the narrative of industrial research, in particular with digital instructional systems serving as “enabler technology” to help them work “better.” ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 41 | 2025 | Edition 5 | Pages 102-110 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.25.5.102
Sustainability Information Across the Supply Chain

Sustainability Information Across the Supply Chain

Structured requirements analysis for using sustainability data in networks
Lina Keefer, David Koch ORCID Icon, Ann-Kathrin Briem, Shaoran Geng
Sustainability has gained increasing importance for all stakeholders in the value creation network in recent years. As a result, companies are working to optimizr their products and processes with respect to the three dimensions of sustainability. To responsibly design production systems that are sustainable in the long term, continuous data exchange between all actors in the value creation network is essential. Both in early product development and in production planning and execution, reliable information and corresponding decision support are crucial. The following article addresses the structured collection of requirements that companies in the automotive industry have for a data model and methodology to enable decision support.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 41 | Edition 4 | Pages 52-58