Measuring Digitalization

A sociotechnical KPI model for the digital transformation

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 37, 2021, Edition 3, Pages 30-34
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_21-3_S30-34
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

A successful digital transformation for attaining Industry 4.0, is a crucial success criterion for many companies today. The ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic has shown the need for digitalization in companies and has further accelerated this development. However, these times, companies are confronted with an uncertain order and profit situation. Thus, they need to allocate their investments purposefully. Evaluating the digital maturity by using a profound indicator system is therefore a sound basis for decision making. This paper develops such a sociotechnical KPI model along the dimensions “Strategy and Organizational Leadership”, “Digital Skills/Human Capital” as well as “Smart Process/Operations”. In the future, this model can be used for determining the digital maturity and thus, it can be applied for allocating digitalization investments.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Zimmermann, V.: KfW-Digitalisierungsbericht Mittelstand 2019. Digitalisierungsprojekte zunehmend im Mittelstand verbreitet, Digitalisierungsausgaben jedoch seit Jahren unverändert niedrig. Frankfurt am Main 2020.
[2] Kersten, W.; von See, B.; Lodemann, S.; Grotemeier, C.: Trends und Strategien in Logistik und Supply Chain Management. Entwicklungen und Perspektiven einer nachhaltigen und digitalen Transformation. Bremen 2020.
[3] Brink, S.; Levering, B.; Icks, A.: Herausforderungen des deutschen Mittelstands in der Corona-Pandemie. Sonderauswertung des Zukunftspanel Mittelstand 2020. Bonn 2020.
[4] Wrobel, M.; Schildhauer, T.; Preiß, K.: Kooperation zwischen Startups und Mittelstand. Learn. Match. Partner. Berlin 2017.
[5] Nielen, S.; Kay, R.; Schröder, C.: Disruptive Innovationen: Chancen und Risiken für den Mittelstand. Bonn 2017.
[6] Leyh, C.; Bley, K.: Digitalisierung: Chance oder Risiko für den deutschen Mittelstand? – Eine Studie ausgewählter Unternehmen. In: HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 53 (2016) 1, S. 29–41.
[7] Franceschini, F.; Galetto, M.; Maisano, D.; Neely, A. D.: Designing performance measurement systems. Theory and practice of key performance indicators. Cham 2019.
[8] Fink, A.: Conducting research literature reviews. From the internet to paper, Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, California 2014.
[9] Krol, F.; Saeed, M. A.; Kersten, W.: A holistic digitalization KPI framework for the aerospace industry. In: Kersten, W.; Blecker, T.; Ringle, C. M. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL)/ Data Science and Innovation in Supply Chain Management. How Data Transforms the Value Chain. Berlin 2020.
[10]Kontić, L.; Vidicki, Đ.: Strategy for digital organization: Testing a measurement tool for digital transformation. In: Strategic Management 23 (2018) 2, S. 29–35.
[11] von See, B.; Kersten, W.: Arbeiten im Zeitalter des Internets der Dinge. Wie Qualifikation, Organisation und Führung digital transformiert werden. In: Industrie 4.0 Management 34 (2018) 3, S. 8–12.
[12]Porfírio, J. A.; Carrilho, T.; Felício, J. A.; Jardim, J.: Leadership characteristics and digital transformation. In: Journal of Business Research 124 (2021), S. 610–19.
[13]Berghaus, S.; Back, A.; Kaltenrieder, B.: Digital Maturity & Transformation Report 2017. St. Gallen 2017.
[14] Lichtblau, K.; Stich, V.; Bertenrath, R.; Blum, M.; Bleider, M.; Millac, A.; Schmitt, K.; Schmitz, E.; Schroeter, M.: Industrie 4.0 Readiness. Aachen, Cologne 2015.
[15]Waspodo, B.; Ratnawati, S.; Halifi, R.: Building Digital Strategy Plan at CV Anugrah Prima, an Information Technology Service Company: The 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM 2018) 2018.
[16]Azhari, P.; Faraby, N.; Rossmann, A.; Steimel, B.; Wichman, K. S.: Digital Transformation Report. Köln 2014.
[17]Deloitte: Digital Maturity Model. Achieving digital maturity to drive growth. New York 2018.
[18]BSP Business School Berlin: Mitelstand im Wandel – Wie ein Unternehmen seinen digitalen Reifegrad ermitteln kann. Berlin 2016.
[19]KPMG: Digital Readiness Assessment. Berlin 2016.
[20]Buhse, W.: Management by Internet. Neue Führungsmodelle für Unternehmen in Zeiten der digitalen Transformation; Unternehmen im Wandel, digitale Medien als Werkzeugkoffer für Veränderer, Vernetzung, Offenheit, Partizipation und Agilität als Werte einer neuen Unternehmenskultur. Kulmbach 2014.
[21] EFQM: EFQM Excellence Modell. Brussels 2012.
[22] Stowasser, S.; Peschl, A.: Arbeitswelt im Wandel: Qualifizierung zu resilienzfördernder Führung. In: Spath, D.; Spanner-Ulmer, B. (Hrsg.): Digitale Transformation – Gutes Arbeiten und Qualifizierung aktiv gestalten. Berlin 2019.
[23]Geissbauer, R.; Vedso, J.; Schrauf, S.: Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise 2016.
[24]Kersten, W.; Seiter, M.; See, B. von; Hackius, N.; Maurer, T.: Chancen der digitalen Transformation. Trends und Strategien in Logistik und Supply Chain Management. Hamburg 2017.
[25] European Commission: The Digital Economy and Societyx Index (DESI). Integration of Digital Technology. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/ newsroom/dae/document. cfm?doc_id=59979. Abrufdatum 08.04.2020.
[26] Schumacher, A.; Erol, S.; Sihn, W.: A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. In: Procedia CIRP 52 (2016), S. 161–66.
[27]Kotarba, M.: Measuring Digitalization – Key Metrics. In: Foundations of Management 9 (2017), S. 123–38. [28]Dombrowski, U.; Wullbrandt, J.; Fochler, S.: Kompetenzentwicklung in der digitalen Transformation: dezentrales und lebenslanges Lernen im Arbeitsprozess. In: Spath, D.; Spanner-Ulmer, B. (Hrsg.): Digitale Transformation – Gutes Arbeiten und Qualifizierung aktiv gestalten. Berlin 2019.

Your downloads


Potentials: Profitability

You might also be interested in

Serious Games as a Training Tool

Serious Games as a Training Tool

Game mechanics design to promote resilience
Annika Lange ORCID Icon, Thomas Knothe ORCID Icon
Unforeseen events are increasingly challenging manufacturing companies. Being resilient during crises is becoming a key competence. Serious games (SG) can help make resilience-building processes more transparent. This article derives specific requirements for SG from different phases of resilience and shows how these can be implemented in game mechanics in order to effectively support the training of resilience.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 98-104
From Brownfield to Industry 4.0

From Brownfield to Industry 4.0

Learning factories as training and testing environment for digital transformation
Jakob Weber, Sven Völker ORCID Icon
To succeed in their digital transformation, manufacturing companies need engineers with in-depth knowledge of key technologies and concepts, and a profound understanding of the transition from Industry 3.0 to Industry 4.0. This article describes the concept of a learning factory that is continuously subjected to a digital transformation, thereby creating an environment for the development of transformation competencies. The concept of digital transformation is based on digital worker assistance systems and multi-agent systems for production control. These enable the incremental integration of existing resources into the digitalized factory. The learning factory is not presented to students as a completed solution. Instead, it is continuously developed further as part of student projects. This way, it contributes directly to the qualification of personnel for the implementation of Industry 4.0.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 88-96
AI Colleagues?

AI Colleagues?

Competence requirements and training for AI use in industry
Swetlana Franken ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence is fundamentally changing tasks, roles, and skills in (industrial) companies. Increasingly, it acts as a colleague, preparing decisions, supporting processes, and interacting with people. This article highlights key competence requirements for AI use in industry, presents an integrated competence model, and outlines practical strategies for the transfer of skills. The aim is to prepare companies and employees for humane, competence-oriented AI implementation that combines technological efficiency with human creativity and judgment.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 78-86
Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Validating an interactive advisory tool in two manufacturing use cases
Pavlos Rath-Manakidis, Henry Huick, Björn Krämer ORCID Icon, Laurenz Wiskott ORCID Icon
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into workplace processes promises significant efficiency gains, yet organizations face numerous ethical challenges that stakeholders are often initially unaware of—from opacity in decision-making to algorithmic bias and premature automation risks. This paper presents the design and validation of tachAId, an interactive advisory tool aimed at embedding human-centered ethical considerations into the development of AI solutions. It reports on a validation study conducted across two distinct industrial AI applications with varying AI maturity. tachAId successfully directs attention to critical ethical considerations across the AI solution lifecycle that might be overlooked in technically-focused development. However, the findings also reveal a central tension: while effective in raising awareness, the tool’s non-linear design creates significant usability challenges, indicating a user preference for more structured, linear guidance, especially ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 50-59 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.48
AI Implementation in Industrial Quality Control

AI Implementation in Industrial Quality Control

A design science approach bridging technical and human factors
Erdi Ünal ORCID Icon, Kathrin Nauth ORCID Icon, Pavlos Rath-Manakidis, Jens Pöppelbuß ORCID Icon, Felix Hoenig, Christian Meske ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant potential to enhance industrial quality control, yet successful implementation requires careful consideration of ethical and human factors. This article examines how automated surface inspection systems can be deployed to augment human capabilities while ensuring ethical integration into workflows. Through design science research, twelve stakeholders from six organizations across three continents are interviewed and twelve sociotechnical design requirements are derived. These are organized into pre-implementation and implementation/operation phases, addressing human agency, employee participation, and responsible knowledge management. Key findings include the critical importance of meaningful employee participation during pre-implementation, and maintaining human agency through experiential learning, building on existing expertise. This research contributes to ethical AI workplace implementation by providing guidelines that preserve human ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 120-127 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.112
Applied AI for Human-Centric Assembly Workplace Design

Applied AI for Human-Centric Assembly Workplace Design

An ethics-informed approach
Tadele Belay Tuli ORCID Icon, Michael Jonek ORCID Icon, Sascha Niethammer, Henning Vogler, Martin Manns ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance smart assembly by predicting human motion and adapting workplace design. Using probabilistic models such as Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs), AI systems anticipate operator actions to improve coordination with robots. However, these predictive systems raise ethical concerns related to safety, fairness, and privacy under the EU AI Act, which classifies them as high-risk. This paper presents a conceptual method integrating probabilistic motion modeling with ethical evaluation via Z-Inspection®. An industrial case study using the Smart Work Assistant (SWA) demonstrates how multimodal sensing (motion, gaze) and interpretable models enable anticipatory assistance. The approach moves from ethics evaluation to ethics-informed work design, yielding transferable principles and a configurable assessment matrix that supports compliance-by-design in collaborative assembly.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 60-68 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.58