Evolving Change Management

Current challenges, success factors and adjustments for digital transformation

Florian Dörries, Marco Wichering, Wolfgang Kersten ORCID Icon
JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 37, 2021, Edition 1, Pages 50-54
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_21-1_S50-54
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

In view of the digital transformation, companies are facing radical changes which could have a big impact on their business success. Change management could help companies to deal with this transformation and to avoid the risk of losing market share to more innovative companies. The more important question at this stage is if traditional Change management models handle this topic well or if they must be adjusted. This article identifies challenges and success factors by using a literature analysis and a survey, by means of which an adapted model for successful Change management is generated.

Keywords

,

Bibliography

[1] Gentemann, L.: Deutsche Wirtschaft läuft der Digitalisierung weiter hinterher. URL: www.bitkom-research.de/de/pressemitteilung/deutsche-wirtschaft-laeuft-der-digitalisierung-weiter-hinterher-0, Abrufdatum 16.09.2020.
[2] Kersten, W.; von See, B.; Lodemann S.; Grotemeier, C.:Trends und Strategien in Logistik und Supply Chain Management – Entwicklungen und Perspektiven einer nachhaltigen und digitalen Transformation. BVL.digital GmbH: Bremen 2020.
[3] Stöcker, C.; Büch, M.; Sandner, P.: Die positive Seite dieser Krise. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine (2020). URL:https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/digitec/chancen-in-der-pandemie-die-positive-seite-die-corona-krise-16733515.html, Abrufdatum: 20.08.2020.
[4] Plattform Industrie 4.0, Arbeitsgruppe 6 „Digitale Geschäftsmodelle“: Zehn Thesen zur Zukunft digitaler Geschäftsmodelle für Industrie 4.0 in der Post-Corona-Ökonomie. URL: www.plattform-i40.de/PI40/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Publikation/Corona_Thesen.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=5, Abrufdatum 16.09.2020.
[5] Kostka, C.: Change Management – Das Praxisbuch für Führungskräfte. München 2016.
[6] Kersten, W.; Schröder, M.;Indorf, M.: Potenziale der Digitalisierung für das Supply Chain Risikomanagement: Eine empirische Analyse. In: Seiter, M.; Grünert, L.; Berlin, S. (Hrsg): Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte von Industrie 4.0. Wiesbaden 2017.
[7] Bowersox, D. J.; Closs, D. J.; Drayer, R. W.: The Digital Transformation: Technology and Beyond, in: Supply Chain Management Review 9 (2005) 1, S. 22-29.
[8] Kane, G. C.; Palmer, D.; Philips, A. N.; Kiron, D.; Buckley, N.: Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press. 2015. URL: www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/fr/Documents/strategy/dup_strategy-not-tech-

nology-drives-digital-transformation.pdf, Abrufdatum 18.04.2020.
[9] Lauer, T.: Change Management. Berlin Heidelberg 2019.
[10] Isern, J.; Pung, C.: Organizing for successful Change Management: A McKinsey global

survey, The McKinsey Quarterly, June (2006), S. 1-8.
[11] Miller, D.: Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different?. In: Journal of Change Management 2 (2002) 4, S. 359-68.
[12] Beer, M.; Nohria, N.: Cracking the Code of Change. In: Harvard Business Review 78(3) (2000), S. 133-141.
[13] Kotter, J. P.: Accelerate!: How the most Innovative Companies Capitalize on Today’s Rapidfire Strategic – and Still Make Their Numbers. In: Harvard Business Review 90 (2012) 11, S. 44-58.
[14] Lewin, K.: Frontiers in Group Dynamics, in: Human Relations 1 (1947) 1, S. 5-41.
[15] Kotter, J. P.: Leading Change. 5. Auflage. München 2018.
[16] Krüger, W.: Excellence in Change. Wiesbaden 2008.
[17] Schumacher, A.; Erol, S.; Sihn, W.: A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. In: Procedia CIRP 52 (2016), S. 161-166.
[18] Harwardt, M.: Management der digitalen Transformation – Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden 2019.
[19] Fujitsu Future Insights: Global Digital Transformation Survey Report 2018. URL: https://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/GLOBAL/vision/2018/download-center/FTSV2018_Survey_EN-1.pdf, Abrufdatum 05.12.2020.
[20] Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie: Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Wirtschaft – Impulse für Wachstum, Beschäftigung und Innovation. Berlin 2015.
[21] Koch, S.: Einführung in das Management von Geschäftsprozessen: Six Sigma, Kaizen und TQM. 2. Auflage. Berlin 2015.

Your downloads

You might also be interested in

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

AI literacy as a prerequisite for augmentation
Uta Wilkens ORCID Icon, Valentin Langholf ORCID Icon, Niklas Obermann ORCID Icon
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) offers new opportunities for organizational knowledge management, particularly when it comes to learning processes at the interface between explicit, firm-specific, and tacit knowledge. Its use is therefore of particular interest for application areas such as industrial maintenance. Based on a mechanical engineering case study, this article demonstrates that augmenting both processes and employees with GenAI requires AI literacy combined with professional skills.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 118-126 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.14
Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Requirements for AI-supported assistance in production and logistics
Bernd Kuhlenkötter ORCID Icon, Daniel Syniawa ORCID Icon
Foundation models are increasingly changing the way robots are used in industry. Instead of writing complex programs line by line, programmers will soon be able to collaborate more closely with AI systems, describe tasks, and review generated solutions. This shifts their role from purely generating code to conceptual, supervisory, and validation activities. This article highlights the new possibilities that large AI models create for robot programming and the changes they entail for work and required skills in industrial practice.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 16-23 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.2
AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

Implications for individual and organizational change
Katharina Hölzle ORCID Icon, Leonie Krauch, Wolfgang Beinhauer ORCID Icon, Carsten Schmidt, Josephine Hofmann ORCID Icon
Is it sufficient to train employees in the use of AI tools, or does the AI organization require an entirely new set of competencies? This paper introduces a digital enablement model comprising three competency dimensions and demonstrates, through an upskilling program implemented at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, how organizations can sustainably bridge the AI adoption gap.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 94-100 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.11
Designing Effective AI Certification

Designing Effective AI Certification

Insights from established certification domains for the standardization of human-centered AI
Katharina Morsch ORCID Icon
Certification for human-centered AI is becoming increasingly important—as a source of competitive differentiation, a response to regulatory expectations, and a mechanism for fostering human-centered work environments. But how can organizations determine whether the underlying requirements are truly embedded in practice? Drawing on expert interviews from established certification domains, this paper shows that the decisive question is answered not during the audit itself, but in the period between audit cycles. Ultimately, it is not the certificate that matters, but the commitment of organizational leadership and the organization as a whole to engage seriously in the certification process and its continuous implementation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 86-92 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.10
Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Towards an industrial platform for selection and configuration
Purushothaman Ganesh ORCID Icon, Baris E. Albayrak ORCID Icon, Jörg Franke ORCID Icon, Till Sindel ORCID Icon, Jens Fürst, Sebastian Lang ORCID Icon
Industrial supply chains must repeatedly reconfigure sourcing strategies in response to disruptions, yet supplier capability information remains heterogeneous and difficult to operationalize. Existing research addresses supplier selection, simulation, and interoperability standards separately, treating discovery, evaluation, and optimization as disconnected steps requiring manual data transformation. This paper presents a framework for a data-driven industrial platform integrating three components: Asset Administration Shell-based supplier profiles structured by an Actor-Service ontology for semantic discovery, automatic discrete-event simulation model generation from layout data for performance evaluation, and KPI-driven configuration using optimization algorithms. The main contributions are an end-to-end interoperable workflow, a two-tier supplier profile concept separating semantic descriptions from simulation parameters, and a standardized KPI interface maintaining consistency ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 50-61 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.6
Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

How collaboration shapes sovereignty and interoperability across industrial applications
Anna Maria Schleimer ORCID Icon, Julia Pampus ORCID Icon
From automotive supply chains to smart factories, data ecosystems promise seamless collaboration across company boundaries. But how can industries build the necessary infrastructure without creating new dependencies? This article explores how open-source software can serve as a foundation and impactful tool for sovereign, interoperable technologies and standards. Yet, open-source software is not a silver bullet; rather, it poses challenges for digital sovereignty in burgeoning data ecosystems.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 6-13 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.1
Christoph Brocks