Additive Manufacturing Value Chain

Development of an SME-specific value chain of additively manufactured final metal parts

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 38, 2022, Edition 3, Pages 25-30
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_22-3_25-30
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Additive manufacturing processes are becoming increasingly important in industry and enable the cost-e ective production of complex components in small quantities. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in particular can bene t from the high customization potential enabling the development of new business models. However, the widespread use of additive processes faces high production costs and technological challenges. Meanwhile, scienti c research focuses on the optimization of individual process steps of additive manufacturing and does not o er su cient support for SMEs. Therefore, this paper deals with the development of a cross-process value chain of additive manufacturing for SMEs. Based on a systematic analysis of scienti c literature, relevant additive manufacturing processes were investigated, and a cross-process value chain was derived. The results were veri ed by expert interviews and central research and development requirements were extracted.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Almeida, H.; Vasco, J.: Expectations of Additive Manufacturing for the Decade 2020–2030. In: H. A. Almeida und J. C. Vasco (Hrsg): Progress in Digital and Physical Manufacturing. Cham 2003.
[2] Wildemann, H.: 3D-Metalldruck. Wertschöpfungskette – Teileauswahl – Industrialisierung – Wirtschaftlichkeit – Einführungsstrategien, 1. Auflage. München 2019.
[3] Gebhardt, A.: Additive Fertigungsverfahren. Additive Manufacturing und 3D-Drucken für Prototyping – Tooling – Produktion, 5 Auflage. München 2016.
[4] Grund, M.: Implementierung von schichtadditiven Fertigungsverfahren – mit Fallbeispielen aus der Luftfahrtindustrie und Medizintechnik. Berlin Heidelberg 2015.
[5] Witt, E.; Anton, C.: Additive Fertigung. Entwicklungen, Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen. Halle (Saale) 2020.
[6] Auth, C.; Arndt, A.; Anderl, R.: Development of a Concept for a Holistic Knowledge-Based Additive Manufacturing over the Entire Lifecycle. In: P. Chiabert, A. Bouras, F. Noël und J. Ríos (Hrsg): Product Lifecycle Management to Support Industry 4.0. Cham 2018.
[7] Kunovjanek, M.; Reiner, G.: How will the Diffusion of Additive Manufacturing Impact the Raw Material Supply Chain Process? In: International Journal of Production Research 58 (2020) 5, S. 1540–1554.
[8] Polenz, S.; Oettel, M.; Lopez, E.; Leyens, C.: Hybride Prozesskette aus Gießen und additiver Fertigung. In: Leightweight Design 12 (2019) 1, S. 58–63.
[9] Durach, C. F.; Kurpjuweit, S.; Wagner, S. M.: The Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Supply Chains. In: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 47 (2017) 10, S. 954–971.
[10] Schmidt, M.; Merklein, M.; Bourell, D.; Dimitrov, D.; Hausotte, T.; Wegener, K.; Overmeyer, L.; Vollertsen, F.; Levy, G. N.: Laser Based Additive Manufacturing in Industry and Academia. In: CIRP Annals 66 (2017) 2, S. 561–583.
[11] Fink, Arlene (2014): Conducting research literature reviews – From the Internet to Paper, 4. Auflage. Los Angeles 2014.
[12] Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P.: Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. In: British Journal of Management 14 (2003) 3, S. 207–222.
[13] Gläser, J.; Laudel, G.: Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrument rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, 4. Auflage. Wiesbaden 2010.
[14] Porter, M. E.: Wettbewerbsvorteile (Competitive advantage). Spitzenleistungen erreichen und behaupten, 1. Auflage. Frankfurt a. M (1989).
[15] Töpfer, A.: Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Anwedungs- und prozessorientierte Grundlagen, 2. Auflage. Berlin Heidelberg 2007.
[16] Oehlrich, M.: Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Eine Einführung am Businessplan-Prozess, 2. Auflage. München 2010.
[17] Porter, M. E.: Wettbewerbsstrategie (Competitive strategy). Methoden zur Analyse von Branchen und Konkurrenten, 10. Auflage. Frankfurt a. M. 1999.
[18] Thornton, A.; Saad, J.; Clayton, J.: Measuring the critical attributes of AM powders. In: Metal Powder Report 74 (2019) 6, S. 314–319.
[19] Dawes, J.; Bowerman, R.; Trepleton, R.: Introduction to the Additive Manufacturing Powder Metallurgy Supply Chain. In: Johnson Matthey Technology Review 59 (2015) 3, S. 243–256.
[20] Jimo, A.; Braziotis, C.; Rogers, H.; Pawar, K.: Traditional vs Additive Manufacturing Supply Chain Configurations: A Comparative Case Study. In: Procedia Manufacturing 39 (2019) 1, S. 765–774
[21] Alkahtani, M.; Abidi, M. H.: Supply Chain in The Era of Additive Manufacturing. In: Garza-Reyes, A. (Hrsg.): International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations management. Pilsen 2019.
[22] Verboeket, V.; Krikke, H.: The Disruptive Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Supply Chains: A Literature Study, Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda. In: Computers in Industry 111 (2019) 1, S. 91–107.
[23] Munsch, M.; Schmidt-Lehr, M.; Wycisk, E.: Additive Manufacturing – New Metal Technologies, 6. Auflage. Hamburg 2020.
[24] Yusuf, S. M.; Cutler, S.; Gao, N.: Review: The Impact of Metal Additive Manufacturing on the Aerospace Industry. In: Metals 9 (2019) 12, S. 1286.
[25] Denkena, B.; Dittrich, M.-A.; Henning, S.; Lindecke, P.: Investigations on a Standardized Process Chain and Support Structure related Rework Procedures of SLM Manufactured Components. In: 18th Machining Innovations Conference for Aerospace Industry (2018), S. 50–57.

Your downloads


You might also be interested in

Serious Games as a Training Tool

Serious Games as a Training Tool

Game mechanics design to promote resilience
Annika Lange ORCID Icon, Thomas Knothe ORCID Icon
Unforeseen events are increasingly challenging manufacturing companies. Being resilient during crises is becoming a key competence. Serious games (SG) can help make resilience-building processes more transparent. This article derives specific requirements for SG from different phases of resilience and shows how these can be implemented in game mechanics in order to effectively support the training of resilience.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 98-104
From Brownfield to Industry 4.0

From Brownfield to Industry 4.0

Learning factories as training and testing environment for digital transformation
Jakob Weber, Sven Völker ORCID Icon
To succeed in their digital transformation, manufacturing companies need engineers with in-depth knowledge of key technologies and concepts, and a profound understanding of the transition from Industry 3.0 to Industry 4.0. This article describes the concept of a learning factory that is continuously subjected to a digital transformation, thereby creating an environment for the development of transformation competencies. The concept of digital transformation is based on digital worker assistance systems and multi-agent systems for production control. These enable the incremental integration of existing resources into the digitalized factory. The learning factory is not presented to students as a completed solution. Instead, it is continuously developed further as part of student projects. This way, it contributes directly to the qualification of personnel for the implementation of Industry 4.0.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 88-96
AI Colleagues?

AI Colleagues?

Competence requirements and training for AI use in industry
Swetlana Franken ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence is fundamentally changing tasks, roles, and skills in (industrial) companies. Increasingly, it acts as a colleague, preparing decisions, supporting processes, and interacting with people. This article highlights key competence requirements for AI use in industry, presents an integrated competence model, and outlines practical strategies for the transfer of skills. The aim is to prepare companies and employees for humane, competence-oriented AI implementation that combines technological efficiency with human creativity and judgment.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 78-86
Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Validating an interactive advisory tool in two manufacturing use cases
Pavlos Rath-Manakidis, Henry Huick, Björn Krämer ORCID Icon, Laurenz Wiskott ORCID Icon
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into workplace processes promises significant efficiency gains, yet organizations face numerous ethical challenges that stakeholders are often initially unaware of—from opacity in decision-making to algorithmic bias and premature automation risks. This paper presents the design and validation of tachAId, an interactive advisory tool aimed at embedding human-centered ethical considerations into the development of AI solutions. It reports on a validation study conducted across two distinct industrial AI applications with varying AI maturity. tachAId successfully directs attention to critical ethical considerations across the AI solution lifecycle that might be overlooked in technically-focused development. However, the findings also reveal a central tension: while effective in raising awareness, the tool’s non-linear design creates significant usability challenges, indicating a user preference for more structured, linear guidance, especially ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 50-59 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.48
AI Implementation in Industrial Quality Control

AI Implementation in Industrial Quality Control

A design science approach bridging technical and human factors
Erdi Ünal ORCID Icon, Kathrin Nauth ORCID Icon, Pavlos Rath-Manakidis, Jens Pöppelbuß ORCID Icon, Felix Hoenig, Christian Meske ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant potential to enhance industrial quality control, yet successful implementation requires careful consideration of ethical and human factors. This article examines how automated surface inspection systems can be deployed to augment human capabilities while ensuring ethical integration into workflows. Through design science research, twelve stakeholders from six organizations across three continents are interviewed and twelve sociotechnical design requirements are derived. These are organized into pre-implementation and implementation/operation phases, addressing human agency, employee participation, and responsible knowledge management. Key findings include the critical importance of meaningful employee participation during pre-implementation, and maintaining human agency through experiential learning, building on existing expertise. This research contributes to ethical AI workplace implementation by providing guidelines that preserve human ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 120-127 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.112
Applied AI for Human-Centric Assembly Workplace Design

Applied AI for Human-Centric Assembly Workplace Design

An ethics-informed approach
Tadele Belay Tuli ORCID Icon, Michael Jonek ORCID Icon, Sascha Niethammer, Henning Vogler, Martin Manns ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance smart assembly by predicting human motion and adapting workplace design. Using probabilistic models such as Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs), AI systems anticipate operator actions to improve coordination with robots. However, these predictive systems raise ethical concerns related to safety, fairness, and privacy under the EU AI Act, which classifies them as high-risk. This paper presents a conceptual method integrating probabilistic motion modeling with ethical evaluation via Z-Inspection®. An industrial case study using the Smart Work Assistant (SWA) demonstrates how multimodal sensing (motion, gaze) and interpretable models enable anticipatory assistance. The approach moves from ethics evaluation to ethics-informed work design, yielding transferable principles and a configurable assessment matrix that supports compliance-by-design in collaborative assembly.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 60-68 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.58