Digitalized Industry and Sustainability

Between Synergy and Dissonance

Frieder Schmelzle, Stefanie Kunkel, Marcel Matthess, Grischa Beier
JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 38, 2022, Edition 1, Pages 7-11
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_22-1_7-11
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

A considerable part of global greenhouse gas emissions is caused in the industrial sector. Its digitialization is often seen as a means to increase sustainability. At the same time, ecological and social risks emerge. Their exploration is still in its infancy, however, previous findings point out multiple challenges. These must be conceptually taken into account in order to realize a sustainable industry 4.0. Building on a literature analysis, the following contribution presents current developments in research, industry, and policy. We shed light on a number of selected approaches, which aim at a sustainable industry 4.0. Finally, practical design options are outlined.

Keywords

, ,

Bibliography

[1] IEA (International Energy Agency): Global energy-related CO2 emissions by sector. URL: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-sector, Abrufdatum 08.10.2021.
[2] Europäische Kommission: EU and the Paris Climate Agreement: Taking stock of progress at Katowice COP. Brüssel, 2018. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:716:FIN, Abrufdatum 11.10.2021.
[3] Sachs, J. D.; Schmidt-Traub, G. u. a.: Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. In: Nature Sustainability 2 (2019) 9, S. 805-814.
[4] Beier, G.; Fritzsche, K. u. a.: Grüne digitalisierte Wirtschaft?. Potsdam, 2020. URL: http://doi.org/10.2312/iass.2020.017, Abrufdatum 14.12.21.
[5] BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit): Umweltpolitische Digitalagenda. Berlin, 2020. https://www.bmu.de/publikation/umweltpolitische-digitalagenda/, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[6] Kiel, D., Müller; J. M. u. a.: Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of industry 4.0. In: International Journal of Innovation Management 21 (2017) 8, S. 231-270.
[7] Semeraro, C.; Lezoche, M. u. a.: Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review. In: Computers in Industry 130 (2021), 103469.
[8] Beier, G.; Ullrich, A. u. a.: Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes – A literature review. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 259 (2020), 120856.
[9] Beier, G.; Niehoff, S. u. a.: Industry 4.0: A step towards achieving the SDGs? A critical literature review. In: Discover Sustainability 2 (2021), S. 1-21.
[10] Waibel, M. W. ; Steenkamp, L. P. u. a.: Investigating the Effects of Smart Production Systems on Sustainability Elements. In: Procedia Manufacturing 8 (2017): S. 731-737.
[11] Barni, A.; Fontana, A. u. a.: Exploiting the Digital Twin in the Assessment and Optimization of Sustainability Performances. In: Jardim-Gonçalves, R.; Mendonça, J. P. u. a. (Hrsg.): International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS). Funchal, 2018.
[12] Vogel-Heuser, B. Hess, D.: Industry 4.0-Prerequisites and Visions. In: Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 13 (2016) 2, S. 411-413.
[13] Tang, H.; Yang, X. u. a.: Effort at Constructing Big Data Sensor Networks for Monitoring Greenhouse Gas Emission. In: International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 10 (2014) 7, 619608.
[14] Kenney, M.; Zysman, J.: The Rise of the Platform Economy. In: Issues in Science and Technology 32 (2016) 3, S. 61-69.
[15] WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen): Towards Our Common Digital Future. Berlin, 2019. URL: https://www.wbgu.de/en/publications/publication/towards-our-common-digital-future, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[16] Plepys, A.; Singh, J.: Evaluating the sustainability impacts of the sharing economy using input-output analysis. In: Mont, O. (Hrsg.): A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance. Cheltenham, 2019.
[17] GeSI (Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative): Digital Solutions for Climate Action. Brüssel, 2020. URL: https://gesi.org/research/download/52, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[18] Agora Energiewende: Energiewende 2030: The Big Picture – Megatrends, Ziele, Strategien und eine 10-Punkte-Agenda für die zweite Phase der Energiewende. Berlin, 2017. URL: https://www.agora-energiewende.de/veroeffentlichungen/energiewende-2030-the-big-picture/, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[19] Rohde, F.; Gährs, S. u. a.: Wie viele Bits braucht die Energiewende?. Berlin, 2020. URL: https://www.nachhaltige-digitalisierung.de/bits-baeume/forum-bits-baeume.html, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[20] Heutmann, T.; Schmitt, R.: Energieorientierte Produktionsplanung und -steuerung – Höhere Energieeffizienz durch intelligentes MES-Softwaremodul. In: Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 112 (2017) 9, S. 563-566.
[21] Shrouf, F.; Miragliotta, G.: Energy management based on Internet of Things: practices and framework for adoption in production management. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 100 (2015), S. 235-246.
[22] Pechmann, A.; Shrouf, F. u. a.: Load-shifting potential at SMEs manufacturing sites: A methodology and case study. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 78 (2017) C, S. 431-438.
[23] Europäische Kommission: Der europäische Grüne Deal. Brüssel, 2019. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[24] Marschneider-Weidemann, F.; Langkau, S. u. a.: Rohstoffe für Zukunftstechnologien. Berlin, 2016. URL: https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isi/dokumente/ccn/2016/Studie_Zukunftstechnologien-2016.pdf, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[25] Coderre-Proulx, M.; Campbell, B. u. a.: International Migrant Workers in the Mining Sector. Genf, 2016. URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_protect/—protrav/—migrant/documents/publication/wcms_538488.pdf, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[26] Manhart, A.; Vogt, R. u. a.: The environmental criticality of primary raw materials — a new methodology to assess global environmental hazard potentials of minerals and metals from mining. In: Mineral Economics 32 (2019) 1, S. 91-107.
[27] Europäische Kommission: Verordnung über Mineralien aus Konfliktgebieten: Wissenswertes über die Verordnung. Brüssel, 2020. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/conflict-minerals-regulation/regulation-explained/index_de.htm, Abrufdatum 13.12.2021.
[28] UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme): Waste Crime – Waste Risks: Gaps in Meeting the Global Waste Challenge. Nairobi, 2015. URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/99476, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[29] Hintemann, R.: Effizienzgewinne reichen nicht aus: Energiebedarf der Rechenzentren steigt weiter deutlich an. Berlin, 2018. URL: https://d-nb.info/1215359780/34, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[30] Bitkom (Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien e. V.): Klimaschutz Durch Digitale Technologien – Chancen Und Risiken. Berlin, 2020. URL: https://www.bitkom.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/2020-05_bitkom_klimastudie_digitalisierung.pdf, Abrufdatum 17.12.2021.
[31] Andrae, A.: Comparison of Several Simplistic High-Level Approaches for Estimating the Global Energy and Electricity Use of ICT Networks and Data Centers. In: International Journal of Green Technology 5 (2019) 1, S. 50-63.
[32] UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization): Accelerating clean energy through Industry 4.0 – Manufacturing the next revolution. Wien, 2017. URL: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/REPORT_Accelerating_clean_energy_through_Industry_4.0.Final_0.pdf, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[33] ITU (International Telecommunication Union): For the first time, more than half of the world’s population is using the Internet. URL: https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/2018-PR40.aspx, Abrufdatum 19.09.2019.
[34] Aggarwal, A.; Gupta, S. u. a.: Adoption of smart and sustainable manufacturing practices: An exploratory study of Indian manufacturing companies. In: Journal of Engineering Manufacture (2021) August.
[35] Pease, S. G.; Trueman, R. u. a.: An intelligent real-time cyber-physical toolset for energy and process prediction and optimisation in the future industrial Internet of Things. In: Future Generation Computer Systems 79 (2018), S. 815-829.
[36] Židek, K.; Pitel’, J. u. a.: Digital Twin of Experimental Smart Manufacturing Assembly System for Industry 4.0 Concept. In: Sustainability 12 (2020) 9, S. 1-16.
[37] Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M.; Legutko, S. u. a.: Maintenance 4.0 Technologies – New Opportunities for sustainability driven Maintenance. In: Management and Production Engineering Review 11 (2020) 2, S. 74-87.
[38] Esmaeilian, B; Sarkis, J. u. a.: Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling 163 (2020), 105064.
[39] Venkatesh, V. G.; Kang, K. u. a.: System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability. In: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 63 (2020), 101896.
[40] GeSI (Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative); Deloitte: Digital with Purpose: Delivering a SMARTer 2030. Brüssel, 2019. URL: https://gesi.org/research/download/36, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[41] Jabbour, C. J. C.; Fiorini, P. D. C. u.a.: Digitally-enabled sustainable supply chains in the 21st century : A review and a research agenda. In: Science of the Total Environment 725 (2020) 138177, S. 1-14.
[42] Bag, S.; Telukdarie, A. u. a.: Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions. In: Benchmarking: An International Journal 28 (2018), S. 1410-1450.
[43] Bundesregierung: Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie. Berlin, 2018. URL: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/service/publikationen/deutsche-nachhaltigkeitsstrategie-aktualisierung-2018-1559086, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[44] Kulbatzki, J.: Frankreich legt vor, wird die EU-Kommission nachziehen? URL: https://netzpolitik.org/2021/right-to-repair-frankreich-legt-vor-wird-die-eu-kommission-nachziehen/, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[45] Europäische Kommission: Aktualisierung der Industriestrategie von 2020: hin zu einem stärkeren Binnenmarkt für die Erholung Europas. Brüssel, 2021. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/ip_21_1884, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[46] Europäische Kommission: Gestaltung der digitalen Zukunft Europas. Brüssel, 2020. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2020:67:FIN, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[47] Europäische Kommission: Eine neue Industriestrategie für Europa. Brüssel, 2020. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0102, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[48] Europäische Kommission: Eine KMU-Strategie für ein nachhaltiges und digitales Europa. Brüssel, 2020. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2020:103:FIN, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[49] Europäische Kommission: Europe’s strategy for international cooperation in a changing world. Brüssel, 2021. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DA/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A0252%3AFIN, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[50] Fritzsche, K.; Niehoff, S. u. a.: Industry 4.0 and Climate Change — Exploring the Science-Policy Gap. In: Sustainability 10 (2018) 4511, S. 1-17.
[51] Weihe, C.: Hinter den Bildschirmen – Energie- und Ressourcenbedarf der Digitalisierung. URL: https://www.oeko.de/e-paper/digitalisierung-konzepte-fuer-mehr-nachhaltigkeit/artikel/hinter-den-bildschirmen/, Abrufdatum 14.12.2021.
[52] Renn, O.; Beier, G. u. a.: The opportunities and risks of digitalisation for sustainable development: A systemic perspective. In: GAIA 30 (2021) 1, S. 23-28.

Your downloads

You might also be interested in

From Private Law to Private Ordering

From Private Law to Private Ordering

Rule-making through industrial digital platforms
Pia C. Romeike, Frederik Bär
Industrial digital platforms are considered the driving force behind digital value creation, yet legally they largely operate in a gray area. This article examines what defines industrial digital platforms and what legal framework applies to them. Existing platform regulations apply only to a limited extent to industrial digital platforms, which is why these platforms often establish their own legal framework through their terms and conditions. The article also explores the implications of European regulation, power asymmetries, and the opportunities and limitations of private regulation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 98-105 | DOI 10.30844/I4SD.26.4.10
Enabling Digital Trust in Green Hydrogen Markets

Enabling Digital Trust in Green Hydrogen Markets

Trust-Building Information Systems and Mechanisms
Johanna Voß, Jens Pöppelbuß ORCID Icon
Building a global hydrogen economy requires more than technology and investment; it requires trust. As information systems (IS) increasingly mediate collaboration among unfamiliar, distributed actors, the question of how trust can be deliberately built becomes critical. This study systematically maps how IS enable different types of trust and reveals how these mechanisms can support trusting collaboration in emerging hydrogen value chains.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 82-90
Industry 4.0—Progress and Digitalization in Limbo

Industry 4.0—Progress and Digitalization in Limbo

Status of sustainable transformation and digitalization in production engineering
Christian Donhauser ORCID Icon, Daniel Riepl
Digitalization projects help users represent complex processes more simply and efficiently. However, there are many obstacles to implementation. Reluctance to implement these projects is palpable. This affects, among others, employers and employees, who may fall behind economically by waiting or avoiding change. These observations can be traced back to an overarching research question: What barriers and systemic challenges hinder sustainable transformation within the context of Industry 4.0, particularly when considering human labor in production engineering? What questions are the affected stakeholders asking? The primary goal of this long-term research project is to define these questions decisively and in detail in order to develop a conceptual foundation that integrates research, teaching, and technological development and thus combines the potential of digital technologies with the experiential and practical knowledge of production workers.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 3 | Pages 56-60
Application Potentials of Chinese Knowledge Platforms

Application Potentials of Chinese Knowledge Platforms

Digital platforms for knowledge transfer in research and education
Yunhao Su, Martin Braun ORCID Icon
Knowledge drives innovation, which is why digital platforms are increasingly used for knowledge transfer. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is a global leader in digitalization and digital platforms are central to Chinese knowledge transfer and innovation systems. This study supplements theoretical concepts of knowledge transfer with empirical findings on the (further) development of relevant knowledge platforms. It examines the influence of specific design features on the functionality and quality of digital knowledge platforms. A literature review identifies seven condensed success criteria. Nine leading Chinese knowledge platforms are categorized based on their transfer logic and functional scope. Online survey participants assess the platform-specific manifestations of the identified criteria and highlight potential and areas for improvement in platform-based knowledge transfer.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 3 | Pages 84-93
VR Training for Multimodal Cobot Interaction

VR Training for Multimodal Cobot Interaction

Virtual learning environments for collaborative robots
Christoph S. Zoller, Justus Langer, Kristoffer Waldow ORCID Icon, Merle Meyer, Arnulph Fuhrmann ORCID Icon
The VIRAMM research project is developing and prototyping a VR-based training concept for the integration of collaborative robots (cobots) in assembly-oriented U-cells. Since the benefits of cobots depend heavily on process, layout, and role integration, VIRAMM addresses the previously lacking consistent scenario design for variant comparisons with Key Performance Indicator (KPI)-based evaluation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 3 | Pages 106-112
Decentralized Coordination of AMRs

Decentralized Coordination of AMRs

Regulations for Autonomous Mobile Robots
Manuel Savadogo, Malte Stonis ORCID Icon, Peter Nyhuis ORCID Icon, Jürgen Hupp
The increasing automation of intralogistics requires flexible and resilient control concepts for Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR). While centralized coordination approaches enable stringent control, they quickly reach their limits in terms of scalability and robustness. This paper therefore presents regulations for the decentralized coordination of AMR within the framework of the ORPHEUS project. The focus is on translating known decentralized decision-making principles into a rule framework tailored to industrial material flow scenarios, addressing both operational task assignment and safety-related conflict situations. ORPHEUS thus makes a significant contribution to the methodological structuring, parameterization, and practical transferability of decentralized coordination logics.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 3 | Pages 96-105
Christoph Brocks