Digital Sustainability Management in Companies |
A Service-Oriented Approach to Develop a Platform for Data-Driven Sustainability Management
| Journal | Industrie 4.0 Management |
| Issue | Volume 38, 2022, Edition 1, Pages 45-47 |
| Open Access | https://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_22-1_45-47 |
| Bibliography | Share | Cite | Download |
Abstract
The digitalization in sustainability management and the creation of a consistent database for sustainability data can significantly support companies in meeting increasing sustainability requirements and transparency regarding the sustainability performance. This paper presents a service-oriented approach for the development of a platform for data-driven sustainability management in manufacturing companies.
Keywords
Bibliography
[1] Löser, F.: Strategic Information Systems Management for Environmental Sustainability: Enhancing Firm Competitiveness with Green IS. Berlin 2015.[2] Seidel, S.; Recker, J.; Vom Brocke, J.: Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations. In: MIS Quarterly 37 (2013) 4, S. 1275-1299.
[3] Schaltegger, S.; Burritt, R.: Contemporary environmental accounting. Issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield 2017.
[4] Burritt, R.; Christ, K.: Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution? In: AJSSR 1 (2016) 1, S. 23-38. DOI: 10.1186/s41180-016-0007-y.
[5] Geibler, J. v.; Wiesen, K.; Mostyn, R.; Werner, M.; Riera, N. u. a.: Forming the Nucleus of a Novel Ecological Accounting System. The myEcoCost Approach. In: Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 572 (2014), S. 78-83.
[6] VDI Zentrum Ressourceneffizienz GmbH (VDI ZRE): Ressourceneffizienz durch Industrie 4.0 – Potenziale für KMU des verarbeitenden Gewerbes. VDI ZRE 2017. ULR: www.ressource-deutschland.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/studien/VDI-ZRE_Studie_KI-betriebliche-Ressourceneffizienz_Web_bf.pdf, Abrufdatum 15.09.2021.
[7] Schaltegger, S.; Herzig, C.; Kleiber, O.; Klinke, T.; Müller, J.: Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in Unternehmen. Von der Idee zur Praxis: Managementansätze zur Umsetzung von Corporate Social Responsibility und Corporate Sustainability. Lüneburg 2007.
[8] WBGU: Unsere gemeinsame digitale Zukunft. Zusammenfassung. 1. Auflage. Berlin 2019.
[9] Miehe, R.; Waltersmann, L.; Sauer, A.; Bauernhansl, T. Sustainable production and the role of digital twins—Basic reflections and perspectives. J. Adv. Manuf. Process. 2021, 3.
[10] Barni, A.; Fontana, A.; Menato, S.; Sorlini, M.; Canetta, L.: Exploiting the Digital Twin in the Assessment and Optimization of Sustainability Performances. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems. 2018.
[11] Waltersmann, L.; Kiemel, S.; Stuhlsatz, J.; Sauer, A.; Miehe, R. Artificial Intelligence Applications for Increasing Resource Efficiency in Manufacturing Companies—A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6689.
[12] Conrad C.: ERP for ESG: Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement mit Software-Systemen. In: CSR und Finance 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54882-6_13.
[13] Bischof, C.; Winkler, H.: Zeitgemäßes Umweltcontrolling mit SAP. In: Tschandl, M.; Posch, A. (eds): Integriertes Umweltcontrolling. Wiesbaden 2012.
[14] Al Assadi, A.; Waltersmann, L.; Miehe, R.; Fechter, M.; Sauer, A.: Automated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) via Asset Administration Shell. In: Weißgraeber, P.; Heieck, F.; Ackermann, C. (eds): Advances in Automotive Production Technology – Theory and Application. ARENA2036. Berlin Heidelberg 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62962-8_6.
[15] DIN und DKE: Deutsche Normungsroadmap Industrie 4.0 Version 3. 2018.
[16] Warnke, P.; Koschatzky, K.; Dönitz, E.; Zenker, A. u. a.: Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions. Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, No. 49. Karlsruhe 2016.
[17] Bartle, M.: Open Innovation. Der offene Umgang mit Wissen verändert das Innovationsmanagement. In: pen Journal of Knowledge Management 1 (2010).
[18] Schneidewind, U.; Singer-Brodowski, M.: Vom experimentellen Lernen zum transformativen Experimentieren. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 16 (2015) 1, S. 10-23.
[19] Schäpke, N.; Stelzer, F.; Caniglia, G.; Bergmann, M.; Wanner, M. u. a.: Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27 (2018) 1, S. 85-96.
[20] Ley, B.; Ogonowski, C.; Mu, M.; Hess, J.; Race, N. u. a.: At home with users: a comparative view of Living Labs. Interacting with Computers, 27 (2015) 1, S. 21-35.
[21] Geibler, J. v.; Erdmann, L.; Liedtke, C.; Rohn, H.; Stabe, M. u. a.: Living Labs für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Wuppertal Spezial Nr. 47. Wuppertal 2013.
[22] Baedeker, C.; Piwowar, J.; Themann, P.; Grinewitschus, V.; Krisemendt, B. u. a.: Interactive Design to Encourage Energy Efficiency in Offices: Developing and testing a User-Centred Building Management System based on a Living Lab Approach. In: Sustainability, Volume 12 (2020) 17, 6956.
[23] Geibler, J. v.; Echternacht, L.; Stadler, K.; Liedtke, C.; Hasselkuß, M. u. a.: Nachhaltigkeitsanforderungen und -bewertung in Living Labs: Konzeption eines Bewertungsmodells. Wuppertal 2016.
[24] Schuurman, D.; Herregodts, A.-L.; Georges, A.; Rits, O.: Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review 9 (2019) 3, S. 63-73.
[25] Liedtke, C., Baedecker, C., Hasselkuß, M., Rohn, H., Grinewitschus, V.: User-Integrated Innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: An Experimental Infrastructure for Researching and Developing Sustainable Product Service Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97. (2015), 106–116.
[26] Geibler, J. v.; Piwowar, J.; Greven, A.: The SDG-Check: Guiding Open Innovation towards Sustainable Development Goals. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9 (2019) 3, S. 20-37.
Your downloads
Potentials: Business Models
You might also be interested in
