Digital Sustainability Management in Companies

A Service-Oriented Approach to Develop a Platform for Data-Driven Sustainability Management

Justus von Geibler ORCID Icon, Julia Brandt, Lara Waltersmann, Robert Miehe, Ralf Tesch
JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 38, 2022, Edition 1, Pages 45-47
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_22-1_45-47
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

The digitalization in sustainability management and the creation of a consistent database for sustainability data can significantly support companies in meeting increasing sustainability requirements and transparency regarding the sustainability performance. This paper presents a service-oriented approach for the development of a platform for data-driven sustainability management in manufacturing companies.

Keywords

,

Bibliography

[1] Löser, F.: Strategic Information Systems Management for Environmental Sustainability: Enhancing Firm Competitiveness with Green IS. Berlin 2015.
[2] Seidel, S.; Recker, J.; Vom Brocke, J.: Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations. In: MIS Quarterly 37 (2013) 4, S. 1275-1299.
[3] Schaltegger, S.; Burritt, R.: Contemporary environmental accounting. Issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield 2017.
[4] Burritt, R.; Christ, K.: Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution? In: AJSSR 1 (2016) 1, S. 23-38. DOI: 10.1186/s41180-016-0007-y.
[5] Geibler, J. v.; Wiesen, K.; Mostyn, R.; Werner, M.; Riera, N. u. a.: Forming the Nucleus of a Novel Ecological Accounting System. The myEcoCost Approach. In: Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 572 (2014), S. 78-83.
[6] VDI Zentrum Ressourceneffizienz GmbH (VDI ZRE): Ressourceneffizienz durch Industrie 4.0 – Potenziale für KMU des verarbeitenden Gewerbes. VDI ZRE 2017. ULR: www.ressource-deutschland.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/studien/VDI-ZRE_Studie_KI-betriebliche-Ressourceneffizienz_Web_bf.pdf, Abrufdatum 15.09.2021.
[7] Schaltegger, S.; Herzig, C.; Kleiber, O.; Klinke, T.; Müller, J.: Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in Unternehmen. Von der Idee zur Praxis: Managementansätze zur Umsetzung von Corporate Social Responsibility und Corporate Sustainability. Lüneburg 2007.
[8] WBGU: Unsere gemeinsame digitale Zukunft. Zusammenfassung. 1. Auflage. Berlin 2019.
[9] Miehe, R.; Waltersmann, L.; Sauer, A.; Bauernhansl, T. Sustainable production and the role of digital twins—Basic reflections and perspectives. J. Adv. Manuf. Process. 2021, 3.
[10] Barni, A.; Fontana, A.; Menato, S.; Sorlini, M.; Canetta, L.: Exploiting the Digital Twin in the Assessment and Optimization of Sustainability Performances. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems. 2018.
[11] Waltersmann, L.; Kiemel, S.; Stuhlsatz, J.; Sauer, A.; Miehe, R. Artificial Intelligence Applications for Increasing Resource Efficiency in Manufacturing Companies—A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6689.
[12] Conrad C.: ERP for ESG: Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement mit Software-Systemen. In: CSR und Finance 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54882-6_13.
[13] Bischof, C.; Winkler, H.: Zeitgemäßes Umweltcontrolling mit SAP. In: Tschandl, M.; Posch, A. (eds): Integriertes Umweltcontrolling. Wiesbaden 2012.
[14] Al Assadi, A.; Waltersmann, L.; Miehe, R.; Fechter, M.; Sauer, A.: Automated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) via Asset Administration Shell. In: Weißgraeber, P.; Heieck, F.; Ackermann, C. (eds): Advances in Automotive Production Technology – Theory and Application. ARENA2036. Berlin Heidelberg 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62962-8_6.
[15] DIN und DKE: Deutsche Normungsroadmap Industrie 4.0 Version 3. 2018.
[16] Warnke, P.; Koschatzky, K.; Dönitz, E.; Zenker, A. u. a.: Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions. Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, No. 49. Karlsruhe 2016.
[17] Bartle, M.: Open Innovation. Der offene Umgang mit Wissen verändert das Innovationsmanagement. In: pen Journal of Knowledge Management 1 (2010).
[18] Schneidewind, U.; Singer-Brodowski, M.: Vom experimentellen Lernen zum transformativen Experimentieren. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 16 (2015) 1, S. 10-23.
[19] Schäpke, N.; Stelzer, F.; Caniglia, G.; Bergmann, M.; Wanner, M. u. a.: Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27 (2018) 1, S. 85-96.
[20] Ley, B.; Ogonowski, C.; Mu, M.; Hess, J.; Race, N. u. a.: At home with users: a comparative view of Living Labs. Interacting with Computers, 27 (2015) 1, S. 21-35.
[21] Geibler, J. v.; Erdmann, L.; Liedtke, C.; Rohn, H.; Stabe, M. u. a.: Living Labs für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Wuppertal Spezial Nr. 47. Wuppertal 2013.
[22] Baedeker, C.; Piwowar, J.; Themann, P.; Grinewitschus, V.; Krisemendt, B. u. a.: Interactive Design to Encourage Energy Efficiency in Offices: Developing and testing a User-Centred Building Management System based on a Living Lab Approach. In: Sustainability, Volume 12 (2020) 17, 6956.
[23] Geibler, J. v.; Echternacht, L.; Stadler, K.; Liedtke, C.; Hasselkuß, M. u. a.: Nachhaltigkeitsanforderungen und -bewertung in Living Labs: Konzeption eines Bewertungsmodells. Wuppertal 2016.
[24] Schuurman, D.; Herregodts, A.-L.; Georges, A.; Rits, O.: Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review 9 (2019) 3, S. 63-73.
[25] Liedtke, C., Baedecker, C., Hasselkuß, M., Rohn, H., Grinewitschus, V.: User-Integrated Innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: An Experimental Infrastructure for Researching and Developing Sustainable Product Service Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97. (2015), 106–116.
[26] Geibler, J. v.; Piwowar, J.; Greven, A.: The SDG-Check: Guiding Open Innovation towards Sustainable Development Goals. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9 (2019) 3, S. 20-37.

Your downloads


Potentials: Business Models

You might also be interested in

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

AI literacy as a prerequisite for augmentation
Uta Wilkens ORCID Icon, Valentin Langholf ORCID Icon, Niklas Obermann ORCID Icon
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) offers new opportunities for organizational knowledge management, particularly when it comes to learning processes at the interface between explicit, firm-specific, and tacit knowledge. Its use is therefore of particular interest for application areas such as industrial maintenance. Based on a mechanical engineering case study, this article demonstrates that augmenting both processes and employees with GenAI requires AI literacy combined with professional skills.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 118-126 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.14
Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Requirements for AI-supported assistance in production and logistics
Bernd Kuhlenkötter ORCID Icon, Daniel Syniawa ORCID Icon
Foundation models are increasingly changing the way robots are used in industry. Instead of writing complex programs line by line, programmers will soon be able to collaborate more closely with AI systems, describe tasks, and review generated solutions. This shifts their role from purely generating code to conceptual, supervisory, and validation activities. This article highlights the new possibilities that large AI models create for robot programming and the changes they entail for work and required skills in industrial practice.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 16-23 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.2
AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

Implications for individual and organizational change
Katharina Hölzle ORCID Icon, Leonie Krauch, Wolfgang Beinhauer ORCID Icon, Carsten Schmidt, Josephine Hofmann ORCID Icon
Is it sufficient to train employees in the use of AI tools, or does the AI organization require an entirely new set of competencies? This paper introduces a digital enablement model comprising three competency dimensions and demonstrates, through an upskilling program implemented at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, how organizations can sustainably bridge the AI adoption gap.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 94-100 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.11
Designing Effective AI Certification

Designing Effective AI Certification

Insights from established certification domains for the standardization of human-centered AI
Katharina Morsch ORCID Icon
Certification for human-centered AI is becoming increasingly important—as a source of competitive differentiation, a response to regulatory expectations, and a mechanism for fostering human-centered work environments. But how can organizations determine whether the underlying requirements are truly embedded in practice? Drawing on expert interviews from established certification domains, this paper shows that the decisive question is answered not during the audit itself, but in the period between audit cycles. Ultimately, it is not the certificate that matters, but the commitment of organizational leadership and the organization as a whole to engage seriously in the certification process and its continuous implementation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 86-92 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.10
Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Towards an industrial platform for selection and configuration
Purushothaman Ganesh ORCID Icon, Baris E. Albayrak ORCID Icon, Jörg Franke ORCID Icon, Till Sindel ORCID Icon, Jens Fürst, Sebastian Lang ORCID Icon
Industrial supply chains must repeatedly reconfigure sourcing strategies in response to disruptions, yet supplier capability information remains heterogeneous and difficult to operationalize. Existing research addresses supplier selection, simulation, and interoperability standards separately, treating discovery, evaluation, and optimization as disconnected steps requiring manual data transformation. This paper presents a framework for a data-driven industrial platform integrating three components: Asset Administration Shell-based supplier profiles structured by an Actor-Service ontology for semantic discovery, automatic discrete-event simulation model generation from layout data for performance evaluation, and KPI-driven configuration using optimization algorithms. The main contributions are an end-to-end interoperable workflow, a two-tier supplier profile concept separating semantic descriptions from simulation parameters, and a standardized KPI interface maintaining consistency ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 50-61 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.6
Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

How collaboration shapes sovereignty and interoperability across industrial applications
Anna Maria Schleimer ORCID Icon, Julia Pampus ORCID Icon
From automotive supply chains to smart factories, data ecosystems promise seamless collaboration across company boundaries. But how can industries build the necessary infrastructure without creating new dependencies? This article explores how open-source software can serve as a foundation and impactful tool for sovereign, interoperable technologies and standards. Yet, open-source software is not a silver bullet; rather, it poses challenges for digital sovereignty in burgeoning data ecosystems.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 6-13 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.1
Christoph Brocks