Standards for Calculating a Carbon Footprint

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 37, 2021, Edition 4, Pages 17-20
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_21-4_S17-20
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Carbon footprints are a widely discussed topic impacting the individuals as well as companies. A company can be transparent in their actions, by publishing a carbon footprint. These footprints can be calculated for a single product or the whole company. However, there is a variety of different carbon footprint standards. The internationally most recognized ones are the publicly available specification 2050, Greenhouse Gas protocol (2011) and ISO 14067. This paper compares the standards and gives a recommendation for the application of product carbon footprints.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Liu, T., Wang, Q., Su, B.: A review of carbon labeling: Standards, implementation, and impact. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53(2016), S. 68-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.050.
[2] Nda, M.; Adnan, M. S.; Ahmad, K. A.; Usman, N.; Razi, M. A. M.; Daud, Z.: A Review on the Causes, Effects and Mitigation of Climate Changes on the En- vironmental Aspects. In: Inter- national Journal of Integrated Engineering, 10 (2018). DOI: 10.30880/ijie.2018.10.04.027.
[3] Olanrewaju, O. A.; Mbohwa, C.: The Need for Greenhouse Gas Analyses in Industrial Sectors. In: Environmental Carbon Footprint, 2018, S. 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812849- 7.00001-5.
[4] Peverali, F.; Ullrich, A.: Um- weltorientiertes Prozessmanagement: Integration von Standards des Umweltmanagements und der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung in eine betriebliche Prozessarchitektur. In: HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 58(2021). DOI: 10.1365/ s40702-020-00698-5.
[5] Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung: Ab 2021: CO2-Preis auf Heiz- und Kraftstoffe, S. 1, Dez. 2020.
[6] DIN-Normenausschuss Grundlagen des Umwelt- schutzes (NAGUS): DIN EN ISO 14067. 2018.
[7] Muthu, S. S. (Hrsg.): Carbon Footprint Case Studies: Municipal Solid Waste Management, Sustainable Road Transport and Carbon Sequestration. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9577-6.
[8] WBCSD/WRI, Greenhouse gas protocol: product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. Washington, DC; Geneva, Switzerland: World Resources Institute; World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2011.
[9] British Standards Institution, PAS 2050:2011: Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. 2011. Zugegriffen: Feb. 11, 2021. [Online]. Verfügbar unter: http://shop.bsigroup.com/upload/shop/download/pas/pas2050.pdf.
[10] Wu, P.; Low, S. P.; Xia, B.; Zuo, J.: Achieving transparency in carbon labelling for construction materials – Lessons from current assessment standards and carbon labels. Environmental Science & Policy, 44(2014), S. 11-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.009.
[11] Hottenroth, H.; Joa, B.; Schmidt, M.: Carbon Foot- prints für Produkte. 2013.
[12] Wang, S.; Wang, W.; Yang, H.: Comparison of Product Carbon Footprint Protocols: Case Study on Medium-Density Fiberboard in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2018), S. 2060. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102060.
[13] Garcia, R.; Freire, F.: Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/ TS 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050 and Climate Declaration, Journal of Cleaner Production, 66(2014), S. 199-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.073.
[14] Ullrich, A.; Gronau, N.: Time to Change: Considering the 4th Industrial Revolution from Three Sustainability Perspectives. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Intelligent Industrial Production and Logistics – Volume 1: IN- 4PL (2020), S. 109-116. DOI: 10.5220/0010148601090116.

Your downloads


Potentials: Resource Efficiency

You might also be interested in

Enabling Digital Trust in Green Hydrogen Markets

Enabling Digital Trust in Green Hydrogen Markets

Trust-Building Information Systems and Mechanisms
Johanna Voß, Jens Pöppelbuß ORCID Icon
Building a global hydrogen economy requires more than technology and investment; it requires trust. As information systems (IS) increasingly mediate collaboration among unfamiliar, distributed actors, the question of how trust can be deliberately built becomes critical. This study systematically maps how IS enable different types of trust and reveals how these mechanisms can support trusting collaboration in emerging hydrogen value chains.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 82-90 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.9
Classification of Digital Supply Chain Management Platforms

Classification of Digital Supply Chain Management Platforms

Review of existing classification approaches from a circular economy perspective
Sophia Botsch ORCID Icon, Eva Mante ORCID Icon, Marcel Papert ORCID Icon, Alexander Pflaum ORCID Icon
Assessing the impact of digital industrial platforms on the dynamics and resilience of supply chains requires clear classification of such platforms. This article examines the extent to which a current classification proposal from the field of supply chain management must be further developed in the context of digital platforms for implementing the circular economy (CE). The authors conclude that a fundamental revision is not necessary, as the digital CE platforms under consideration fit well into the existing classification system. However, new research questions arise regarding the distinction between digital service platforms and digital data-oriented platforms, as well as the link between the circular economy and supply chain management—particularly in connection with supply chain control towers, which are becoming increasingly established in supply chain management practice.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 62-70 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.7
Digital Twins for Emission Reduction

Digital Twins for Emission Reduction

Ex-ante case study on a pump test bench in industrial production
Felix Bischoff, Ingela Tietze ORCID Icon, Peter Hertweck, Nina van Hasz
Digital twins are frequently referred to as a promising approach for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in industrial production; however, robust empirical evidence of their benefits under real-world conditions is largely lacking. In this case study, the emission reduction potential of a digital twin—as a conceptually described target system—is quantified ex-ante via the example of a test bench for hydraulic pumps. To this end, the GHG emissions of the original test plan for the year 2025 are determined based on actual measured energy consumption of the tested pumps and time-resolved grid electricity emission intensities. This is followed by a rule-based rescheduling, in which energy-intensive test processes are shifted to time intervals with lower emissions. The rescheduling takes operational constraints into account so that processes and equipment remain unchanged. The savings potential is determined by comparing the GHG emissions of the reference and the optimized case.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 3 | Pages 16-24 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.3.2
Building the Future Workforce Today

Building the Future Workforce Today

Trendiation as a strategic framework for employee qualification and training
Jürgen Fritz, Sebastian Busse, Ingo Dieckmann, Torsten Laub
As Industry 4.0 and artificial intelligence reshape organizational capabilities, traditional training systems struggle to keep pace with evolving skill requirements. This paper introduces Trendiation—a structured methodology for translating emerging trends into actionable strategies—as a systematic approach to this challenge. Through a workshop-based application examining Edutainment, Human-Centered Design, and Workforce Transformation, we demonstrate how organizations can move from abstract trend identification to concrete qualification requirements and prioritized training initiatives. The method produces a traceable artifact chain spanning trend framing, capability-gap assessment, and implementation roadmaps. Participant evaluations indicate high perceived clarity and practical utility. By bridging foresight analysis with participatory design, Trendiation enables organizations to proactively cultivate adaptive capabilities and build learning cultures aligned with future work ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 22-29 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.2.22
Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Validating an interactive advisory tool in two manufacturing use cases
Pavlos Rath-Manakidis, Henry Huick, Björn Krämer ORCID Icon, Laurenz Wiskott ORCID Icon
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into workplace processes promises significant efficiency gains, yet organizations face numerous ethical challenges that stakeholders are often initially unaware of—from opacity in decision-making to algorithmic bias and premature automation risks. This paper presents the design and validation of tachAId, an interactive advisory tool aimed at embedding human-centered ethical considerations into the development of AI solutions. It reports on a validation study conducted across two distinct industrial AI applications with varying AI maturity. tachAId successfully directs attention to critical ethical considerations across the AI solution lifecycle that might be overlooked in technically-focused development. However, the findings also reveal a central tension: while effective in raising awareness, the tool’s non-linear design creates significant usability challenges, indicating a user preference for more structured, linear guidance, especially ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 50-59 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.48
JOCAT (Job Change Acceptance Toolbox)

JOCAT (Job Change Acceptance Toolbox)

A change management approach for implementing AI systems ethically and sustainably
Sophie Berretta ORCID Icon, Pauline Nolte, Annette Kluge ORCID Icon, Skrolan Kopka
AI systems challenge conventional change management due to their dynamic, opaque, and ethically sensitive nature. This article applies insights from established change models to AI-specific challenges, illustrated by a real-world use case. The resulting propositions are substantiated by six expert interviews, which integrate practical perspectives. Together, they inform the development of the Job Change Acceptance Toolbox (JOCAT), a modular, practice-oriented resource designed to support the implementation of human-centered, ethical, and sustainable AI-related change processes.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | Edition 1 | Pages 80-91 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.74