Product Modularization Along the Supply Chain

Bibliography

[1] Krause, D.; Gebhardt, N.: Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien – Hohe Produktvielfalt beherrschbar entwickeln (2018).
[2] Daniildis, C.: Planungsleitfa- den für die systematische Analyse- und Verbesserung von Produktarchitekturen 2017.
[3] Verband Deutscher Maschinen- und Anlagenbau e.V.: Zukunftsperspektive deutscher Maschinenbau (2014).
[4] Werner, H.: Supply Chain Management – Grundlagen, Strategien, Instrumente und Controlling, 6. Auflage. Wies- baden 2017.
[5] Skirde, H.; Kersten, W.; Schröder, M.: Measuring the cost effects of modular product architectures. In: International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (2016).
[6] Wildemann, H.: Supply Chain Management – Leitfaden für ein unternehmensübergreifendes Wertschöpfungsmanagement (2016).
[7] Serdarasan, S.: A review of supply chain complexity drivers. In: Computers & Industrial Engineering (2013).
[8] Ulrich, K.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. In: Research Policy (1995).
[9] Smith, G. F.; Browne, G. J.: Conceptual Foundations of De- sign Solving Problems. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (1993).
[10]Gan, T.-S.; Grunow, M.: Con- current Product – Supply Chain Design: A Conceptual Framework & Literature Re- view. In: Procedia CIRP (2013).
[11] Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P.: Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. In: British Journal of Management 14 (2003) 3, S. 207–22.
[12] Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D.: Producing a Systematic Review. In: Buchanan, D. A.; Bryman, A. (Hrsg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizationen Research Methods. London 2009.
[13] Mayring, P.; Fenzl, T.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur, N.; Blasius, J. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden 2019.
[14] Skirde, H.: Kostenorientierte Bewertung modularer Produktarchitekturen (2015).
[15] Aoki, K.; Staeblein, T.: Monozukuri capability and dynamic product variety: An analysis of the design-manufacturing interface at Japanese and German automakers. In: Technovation 70-71 (2018), S. 33–45.
[16] Brun, A.; Zorzini, M.: Evaluation of product customization strategies through modularization and postponement. In: International Journal of Production Economics 120 (2009) 1, S. 205–20.
[17] Cabigiosu, A.; Camuffo, A.: Measuring Modularity: Engineering and Management Effects of Different Approaches (2017).
[18] Caniato, F.; Größler, A.: The moderating effect of product complexity on new product development and supply chain management integration. In: Production Planning & Control 26 (2015) 16, S. 1306–17.
[19] Lau, A. K.W.; Yam, R. C.M.; Tang, E. P.Y.; Sun, H. Y.: Factors influencing the relationship between product modularity and supply chain integration. In: International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30 (2010) 9, S. 951–77.
[20] Suh, C. J.; Lee, I. T.: An Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Firm’s Strategic Choice for Sustainability in SMEs. In: Sustainability 10 (2018) 3, S. 572.[21] Cheng, L.-C.: Assessing performance of utilizing organizational modularity to manage supply chains: Evidence in the US manufacturing sector. In: International Journal of Production Economics 131 (2011) 2, S. 736–46.
[22] Das, K.; Chowdhury, A. H.: De- signing a reverse logistics net- work for optimal collection, recovery and quality-based product-mix planning. In: International Journal of Production Economics 135 (2012) 1, S. 209–21.
[23] Droge, C.; Vickery, S. K.; Jacobs, M. A.: Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/ process strategy and service performance? An empirical study. In: International Journal of Production Economics 137 (2012) 2, S. 250–62.
[24] Gomes, P. J.; Dahab, S.: Bundling resources across supply chain dyads. In: International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30 (2010) 1, S. 57–74.
[25] Haug, A.: Improving the de- sign phase through interorganisational product knowledge models (2015).
[26] Huang, T.-T. A.; Stewart, R. A.; Le Chen: Identifying key enablers to improve business performance in Taiwanese electronic manufacturing companies. In: International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30 (2010) 2, S. 155–80.
[27] Lee, H. L.; Schmidt, G.: Using Value Chains to Enhance Innovation. In: Production and Operations Management 26 (2017) 4, S. 617–32.
[28] Caridi, M.; Pero, M.; Sianesi, A.: Linking product modularity and innovativeness to supply chain management in the Italian furniture industry.
[29] Sorkun, M. F.; Furlan, A.: Product and Organizational Modularity: A Contingent View of the Mirroring Hypothesis. In: European Management Re- view 14 (2017) 2, S. 205–24.
[30]Squire, B.; Cousins, P. D.; Law- son, B.; Brown, S.: The effect of supplier manufacturing capabilities on buyer responsiveness. In: International Journal of Operations & Production Management 29 (2009) 8, S. 766–88.
[31] Aitken, J.; Harrison, A.: Supply governance structures for re- verse logistics systems (2013).
[32] Ergu, D.; Kou, G.; Shang, J.: A Modular-Based Supplier Evaluation Framework:. A Comprehensive Data Analysis of ANP Structure (2014).
[33] Romano, P.; Formentini, M.: Designing and implement- ing open book accounting in buyer–supplier dyads A framework for supplier selection and motivation (2012).
[34] Chavez, R.; Yu, W.; Gimenez, C.; Fynes, B.; Wiengarten, F.: Customer integration and operational performance: The mediating role of information quality (2015).