The Appropriate Degree of Autonomy in Cyber-Physical Production Systems

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 34, 2018, Edition 6, Pages 7-12
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_18-6_7-12
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Existing factories face multiple problems due to their hierarchical structure of decision making and control. Cyber-physical systems principally allow to increase the degree of autonomy to new heights. But which degree of autonomy is really useful and beneficiary? This paper differentiates diverse definitions of autonomy and approaches to determine them. Some experimental findings in a lab environment help to answer the question raised in this paper.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] ten Hompel, M.; Liekenbrock, D.: Autonome Objekte und selbst organisierende Systeme. Anwendung neuer Steuerungsmethoden in der Intralogistik. In: Industrie Management 21 (2005) 4, S. 15-18.
[2] Veigt, M.: Entwicklung eines Cyber-Physischen LogistiksystemS. In: Industrie Management 29 (2013) 1, S. 15-18.
[3] Gronau, N.: Der Einfluss von Cyber-Physical Systems auf die Gestaltung von Produktionssystemen, Industrie Management 31 (2015) 3, S. 16-20.
[4] acatech (ed.): Cyber-Physische Systeme. Innovationsmotor für Mobilität, Gesundheit, Energie und Produktion (acatech POSITION). Heidelberg 2011.
[5] Gronau, N.: Wandlungsfähigkeit in Produktion und Logistik, Productivity Management 2 (2014), S. 23-26.
[6] Gronau, N.; Theuer, H.: Determination of the optimal degree of autonomy in a cyber-physical production system. Procedia CIRP 57 (2016), S. 110-115
[7] Gronau, N.: Determinants of an Appropriate Degree of Autonomy in a Cyber-physical Production System. Procedia CIRP 52 (2016), S. 1-5.
[8] Luck, M.; d’Inverno, M.: A Formal Framework for Agency and Autonomy. In: Procs First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems. AAAI 1995.
[9] van der Vecht, B.: A Dynamic Coordination Mechanism Using Adjustable Autonomy. In: Sichman, J.; Noriega, P.; Padget, J.; Ossowski, S. (Hrsg): International Workshops on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems III, COIN 2007: COIN@AAMAS 2007 and COIN@MALLOW 2007, 3-4 September 2007, Durham., S. 83-96.
[10] Windt, K.: Autonomy in production logistics: Identification, characterization and application. Robot Comput Integr Manuf (2007), doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2007.07.008.
[11] Gronau, N.; Theuer, H.: Industrie 4.0 in Europa – Ein Vergleich Europäischer Initiativen In: Industrie Management 5 (2015), S. 31-34.
[12] Hülsmann, M.; Windt, K.: Understanding Autonomous Cooperation and Control in LogisticS. Berlin Heidelberg 2007.
[13] Scholz-Reiter, B., Görges, M., & Philipp, T. (2009). Autonomously controlled production systems — Influence of autonomous control level on logistic performance. CIRP annals 58.1 (2009): 395-398.
[14] Dashkovskiy et al. 2011: Modeling and stability analysis of autonomously controlled production networks. In: Logist. Res. (2011) 3:145–157 DOI 10.1007/s12159-011-0049-6
[15] Windt K, et al. Autonomy in production logistics: Identification, characterisation and application. Robot Comput Integr Manuf (2007), doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2007.07.008
[16] Armbruster, D., et al. “Autonomous control of production networks using a pheromone approach.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its applications 363.1 (2006): 104-114.
[17] Karimi, Hamid Reza, Neil A. Duffie, and Sergey Dashkovskiy. “Local Capacity H∞Control for Production Networks of Autonomous Work Systems With Time-Varying Delays.” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 7.4 (2010): 849-857.
[18] Caridi, M. & Cavalieri, S. (2004) Multi-agent systems in production planning and control: an overview, Production Planning and Control, 15:2, 106-118, DOI: 10.1080/09537280410001662556
[19] Theuer, H.; Gronau, N.; Lass, S.: The Impact of Autonomy on Lean Manufacturing SystemS. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Flexible & Intelligent Manufacturing (FAIM 2013). Porto 2013.
[20] Rother, M.; Shook, J.: Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA. Lean Enterprise Institute Cambridge 1999.
[21] Gronau, N.; Grum, M.; Bender, B.: Determining the optimal level of autonomy in cyber-physical production systemS. Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on. IEEE 2016.
[22] Lass, S.; Theuer, H.; Gronau, N.: A New Approach for Simulation and Modeling of Autonomous Production ProcesseS. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2012). Maui, Hawaii 2012.
[23] Gronau, N.; Theuer, H.; Lass, S.: Evaluation of Production Processes using Hybrid Simulation. In: Windt, K. (Hrsg): Robust Manufacturing Control, Lecture Notes in Production Engineering. Berlin Heidelberg 2013.
[24] Lass, S.: Simulationskonzept zur Nutzenvalidierung cyber-physischer Systeme in komplexen Fabrikumgebungen. PhD thesis Potsdam University 2017.

Your downloads


You might also be interested in

MAKI—A Digital Assistant for Practice-Based Learning

MAKI—A Digital Assistant for Practice-Based Learning

Why every factory is a learning factory
Olaf Resch ORCID Icon
With the help of digital assistants, academic teaching is possible in any factory. In order to achieve the best learning effects, however, the interests of all stakeholders must be taken into account. The factory wishes to deploy its employees quickly and productively, the learners desire a positive learning experience, and the educators want to illustrate abstract concepts in a meaningful and practical way. The only way to combine all of these perspectives is via a well-thought-out educational concept and highly functioning technology.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 70-77
Learning Factories for the Future of Manufacturing in Brazil

Learning Factories for the Future of Manufacturing in Brazil

Advancing manufacturing through technology and skills development
Manufacturing firms in developing countries face challenges in closing productivity gaps while adopting Industry 4.0 technologies. Learning factories are one helpful approach to countering these challenges. One such example is the learning factory Fábrica do Futuroin São Paulo, Brazil, which has engaged students, supported competence development, and collaborated with industry in applied research, functioning as a hub for advanced manufacturing initiatives.
Serious Gaming and the Energy Transition

Serious Gaming and the Energy Transition

Collaborative knowledge generation and interactive understanding of complex interrelationships
Janine Gondolf ORCID Icon, Gert Mehlmann, Jörn Hartung, Bernd Schweinshaut, Anne Bauer
Conveying the complexity and multifaceted nature of the energy transition to a broad audience is a challenge. This article demonstrates how interactive serious games on a multitouch table can help make connections tangible and comprehensible. The games and the table were used in various conversational contexts. These are presented here in three case vignettes based on participant observation of the different applications, as well as situated and shared reflection. The vignettes demonstrate how interaction can trigger epistemic processes, enable shifts in perspective, and foster collective thinking, all of which are necessary for shaping the future of society as a whole.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 62-69
Industrial Transformation via a Machining Learning Factory

Industrial Transformation via a Machining Learning Factory

A learning module to foster competencies for a sustainability-driven transformation
Oskay Ozen ORCID Icon, Victoria Breidling ORCID Icon, Stefan Seyfried ORCID Icon, Matthias Weigold
Sustainability-enhancing transformation processes are necessary in all sectors if we are to remain within planetary boundaries. This also applies to the industrial sector as a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. Employees need new competencies to master this complex task of industrial transformation. These range from CO2 equivalents accounting to the development and evaluation of transformation scenarios, including technical measures. The learning module developed here addresses these competency requirements and uses the example of the ETA factory to show how a competency-oriented learning module for industrial transformation can be structured. It essentially comprises four phases: data collection and CO2 equivalents accounting, cause analysis, development of measures and evaluation of measures.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | Edition 2 | Pages 38-47 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.2.38
Experiencing Digital Twins in Production and Logistics

Experiencing Digital Twins in Production and Logistics

The fischertechnik® Learning Factory 4.0 as a development platform for possible expansion stages
Deike Gliem ORCID Icon, Sigrid Wenzel ORCID Icon, Jan Schickram, Tareq Albeesh
The fischertechnik® Learning Factory 4.0 has proven to be a suitable experimental environment for testing digital twins. Depending on the targeted maturity stage, the functions of a digital twin range from status monitoring and forecasting to the operational control of production and logistics systems. To systematically classify these functions, this article presents a maturity model that serves as a framework for the development of a digital twin. Building on this, selected use cases are implemented in a test and development environment based on a system architecture with multi-layered logic structure. These initial implementations serve to highlight application purposes, relevant methods, and typical challenges and potentials in the transfer to real factory environments.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | Edition 2 | Pages 30-37 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.2.30
Collaborative Robots in Production Environments

Collaborative Robots in Production Environments

Employee qualification and acceptance for human-machine interaction
Tobias Wienzek, Mathias Cuypers ORCID Icon
The introduction of new technologies poses a major challenge, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). At the same time, SMEs must rise to this challenge in order to keep pace technologically and economically. Employee acceptance is an important factor in ensuring that both the introduction and the long-term use of a technology are successful. At the same time, the introduction process also has a central influence on acceptance in the long term. This article uses the implementation of collaborative robotics as an example for examining such an introduction process, identifying the key factors that influence employee acceptance and the important role played by advanced employee training. It serves to highlight how the introduction process and employee training are seamlessly interlinked.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 14-21 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.2.14