Digital Twins for Circular Economy

Enabling Decision Support for R-Strategies

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 38, 2022, Edition 6, Pages 42-46
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/IM_22-6_33-36
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Digital twins (DT) for circular economy (CE) offer a promising approach as part of digital data ecosystems for more sustainable value creation. By mapping and analyzing product, component and material specific data along the li- fecycle, it is possible to address current challenges such as climate change and resource scarcity. Within Catena-X, specific solutions based on this cross-company exchanged data and information are developed. Here, the “R-Strategy Assistant” is presented. It is an application, which identifies the best CE-Strategy based on DT data at the end of a vehicle's life.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Europäische Kommission: Mitteilung der Kommission an das Europäische Parlament, den Europäischen Rat, den Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschluss und den Ausschluss der Regionen. Der europäische Grüne Deal 2019.
[2] The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end of life vehicles 2002.
[3] Verein Catena-X Automotive Network e.V.: Die Vision von Catena-X. URL: https://catena-x.net/de/vision-ziele, Abrufdatum 04.07.2022.
[4] Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz (BMUV): Altfahrzeuge. URL: www.bmuv.de/themen/wasser-ressourcen-abfall/kreislaufwirtschaft/abfallarten-abfallstroeme/altfahrzeuge. Abrufdatum 04.07.2022.
[5] Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Towards the Circular Economy. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. In: Journal of Industrial Ecology (2013) 2.1, S. 13-35.
[6] Potting,J.; Hekkert,M. P.; Worrell, E.; Hanemaaijer, A.: Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain. In: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (2017) 2544, S. 4-21.
[7] Open Manufacturing Platform: Blog: Introducing the BAMM Aspect Meta Model for Digital Twins. URL: https://open-manufacturing.org/blog/2021/06/01/bamm-aspect-meta-model-for-digital-twins/. Abrufdatum 11.07.2022.
[8] Catena-X Automotive Network Konsortium: Semantic Layer/Digital Twins. URL: https://catena-x.net/de/angebote/digitaler-zwilling, Abrufdatum 13.07.2022.
[9] Riedelsheimer, T.; Gogineni, S.; Stark, R.: Methodology to develop Digital Twins for energy efficient customizable IoT-Products. In: Procedia CIRP (2021) 98, S. 258-63.
[10] Riedelsheimer, T.; Lünnemann, P.; Wehking, S.; Dorfhuber, L.: Digital Twin Readiness Assessment. Eine Studie zum Digitalen Zwilling in der fertigenden Industrie. 2020.
[11] Preut, A.; Kopka, J.-P.; Clausen, U.: Digital Twins for the Circular Economy. In: Sustainability 13 (2021) 18, S. 1-13.
[12] Boschert, S.; Rosen R.: Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect. In: Hehenberger, P.; Bradley, D. (Hrsg): Mechatronic Futures. 2016.
[13] Qi, Q.; Tao, F.: Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison. In: IEEE Access 6 (2018), S. 3585-3593.
[14] Wang, X. V.; Wang, L.: Digital twin-based WEEE recycling, recovery and remanufacturing in the background of Industry 4.0. In: International Journal of Production Research 57 (2019) 12, S. 3892- 3902.
[15] Baldassarre, B.; Maury, T.; Mathieux, F.; Garbarino, E.; Antonopoulos, I.; Sala, S.: Drivers and Barriers to the Circular Economy Transition: The Case of Recycled Plastics in the Automotive Sector in the European Union. In: Procedia CIRP 105 (2022), S. 37-42.
[16] Malinauskaite, J.; Anguilano, L.; Rivera, X. S.: Circular waste management of electric vehicle batteries: Legal and technical perspectives from the EU and the UK post Brexit. In: International Journal of Thermofluids 10 (2021), S. 1-8.
[17] The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020 2020.
[18] The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC 2022.
[19] Di Maio, F.; Rem, P. C.: A Robust Indicator for Promoting Circular Economy through Recycling. In: Journal of Environmental Protection 06 (2015) 10, S. 1095-1104.

Your downloads


You might also be interested in

Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Requirements for AI-supported assistance in production and logistics
Bernd Kuhlenkötter ORCID Icon, Daniel Syniawa
Foundation models are increasingly changing the way robots are used in industry. Instead of writing complex programs line by line, programmers will soon be able to collaborate more closely with AI systems, describe tasks, and review generated solutions. This shifts their role from purely generating code to conceptual, supervisory, and validation activities. This article highlights the new possibilities that large AI models create for robot programming and the changes they entail for work and required skills in industrial practice.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 44 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 16-23 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.2
AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

Implications for individual and organizational change
Wolfgang Beinhauer, Josephine Hofmann, Leonie Krauch, Katharina Morsch, Carsten Schmidt
Is it sufficient to train employees in the use of AI tools, or does the AI organization require an entirely new set of competencies? This paper introduces a digital enablement model comprising three competency dimensions and demonstrates, through an upskilling program implemented at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, how organizations can sustainably bridge the AI adoption gap.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 44 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 94-100
Designing Effective AI Certification

Designing Effective AI Certification

Insights from established certification domains for the standardization of human-centered AI
Katharina Morsch
Certification for human-centered AI is becoming increasingly important—as a source of competitive differentiation, a response to regulatory expectations, and a mechanism for fostering human-centered work environments. But how can organizations determine whether the underlying requirements are truly embedded in practice? Drawing on expert interviews from established certification domains, this paper shows that the decisive question is answered not during the audit itself, but in the period between audit cycles. Ultimately, it is not the certificate that matters, but the commitment of organizational leadership and the organization as a whole to engage seriously in the certification process and its continuous implementation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 44 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 86-92 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.8
Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Towards an industrial platform for selection and configuration
Purushothaman Ganesh ORCID Icon, Baris E. Albayrak ORCID Icon, Jörg Franke ORCID Icon, Till Sindel ORCID Icon, Jens Fürst, Sebastian Lang ORCID Icon
Industrial supply chains must repeatedly reconfigure sourcing strategies in response to disruptions, yet supplier capability information remains heterogeneous and difficult to operationalize. Existing research addresses supplier selection, simulation, and interoperability standards separately, treating discovery, evaluation, and optimization as disconnected steps requiring manual data transformation. This paper presents a framework for a data-driven industrial platform integrating three components: Asset Administration Shell-based supplier profiles structured by an Actor-Service ontology for semantic discovery, automatic discrete-event simulation model generation from layout data for performance evaluation, and KPI-driven configuration using optimization algorithms. The main contributions are an end-to-end interoperable workflow, a two-tier supplier profile concept separating semantic descriptions from simulation parameters, and a standardized KPI interface maintaining consistency ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 50-61 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.6
Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

How collaboration shapes sovereignty and interoperability across industrial applications
Anna Maria Schleimer ORCID Icon, Julia Pampus ORCID Icon
From automotive supply chains to smart factories, data ecosystems promise seamless collaboration across company boundaries. But how can industries build the necessary infrastructure without creating new dependencies? This article explores how open-source software can serve as a foundation and impactful tool for sovereign, interoperable technologies and standards. Yet, open-source software is not a silver bullet; rather, it poses challenges for digital sovereignty in burgeoning data ecosystems.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 6-13 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.1
From Private Law to Private Ordering

From Private Law to Private Ordering

Rule-making through industrial digital platforms
Pia C. Romeike, Frederik Bär
Industrial digital platforms are considered the driving force behind digital value creation, yet legally they largely operate in a gray area. This article examines what defines industrial digital platforms and what legal framework applies to them. Existing platform regulations apply only to a limited extent to industrial digital platforms, which is why these platforms often establish their own legal framework through their terms and conditions. The article also explores the implications of European regulation, power asymmetries, and the opportunities and limitations of private regulation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 98-105 | DOI 10.30844/I4SD.26.4.11