Industry 4.0 in Remanufacturing

Analysis and evaluation of current research approaches

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 37, 2021, Edition 4, Pages 37-40
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_21-4_S37-40
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Remanufacturing, previously characterized by manual and cost-intensive processes, is a critical step on the way to a resource-efficient circular economy. Industry and research agree that the introduction of Industry 4.0 technologies is the key to the development of automated and economical remanufacturing systems. Based on a systematic literature review, this paper is dedicated to the analysis of promising Industry 4.0 approaches with a focus on the overall process as well as the sub-processes of disassembly and inspection. The results suggest that there is a need for additional knowledge, experience and research in the development and real demonstration of the approaches and their transferability to broader application fields.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Chakraborty, K. u. a.: A Study on Remanufacturing Possibility of a Product. In: Microsystem Technologies 25 (5), S. 1765–1770 (2019).
[2] Steinhilper, R.: Remanufacturing: The Ultimate Form of Recycling. Stuttgart (1998).
[3] Ijomah, W. L. u. a.: Development of Robust Design-for-Remanufacturing Guidelines to Further the Aims of Sustainable Development. In: International Journal of Production Research 45 (18-19), S. 4513–4536 (2007).
[4] Huang, W. u. a.: Remanufacturing Scheme Design for Used Parts Based on Incomplete Information Reconstruction. In: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 33 (5), 41 (2020).
[5] Kerin, M.; Pham, D. T.: Smart Remanufacturing: A Review and Research Framework. In: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 31 (6), S. 1205–1235 (2020).
[6] Yang, S. u. a.: Opportunities for Industry 4.0 to Support Remanufacturing. In: Applied Sciences 8 (7), S. 1177 (2018).
[7] Pistorius, J.: Industrie 4.0 – Schlüsseltechnologien fur die Produktion: Grundlagen, Potenziale, Anwendungen. Berlin, Heidelberg (2020).
[8] Sundin, E. u. a.: Design for Automatic End-of-Life Processes. In: Assembly Automation 32 (4), S. 389–398 (2012).
[9] Wang, X. u. a.: From Cloud Manufacturing to Cloud Remanufacturing: A Cloud-based Approach for WEEE Recovery. In: Manufacturing Letters 2 (4), S. 91-95 (2014).
[10] Wang, X. V.; Wang, L.: WRCloud: A Novel WEEE Remanufacturing Cloud System. In: Conference: Procedia CIRP 29, S. 786–791 (2015).
[11] Wang, X. V.; Wang, L.: Digital Twin-based WEEE Recycling, Recovery and Remanufacturing in the Background of Industry 4.0. In: International Journal of Production Research 57 (12), S. 3892–3902 (2019).
[12] Fang, H. C. u. a.: Use of Embedded Smart Sensors in Products to Facilitate Remanufacturing. In: Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, S. 3265–3290 (2015).
[13] Zhou, W.; Piramuthu, S.: Remanufacturing with RFID Item-level Information: Optimization, Waste Reduction and Quality Improvement. In: International Journal of Production Economics 145 (2), S. 647–657 (2013).
[14] Zhang, Y. u. a.: The ‘Internet of Things’ Enabled Real-Time Scheduling for Remanufacturing of Automobile Engines. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 185, S. 562–575 (2018).
[15] Okorie, O. u. a.: Towards a Simulation-Based Understanding of Smart Remanufacturing Operations: A Comparative Analysis. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 14 (2), (2020).
[16] Ondemir, O.; Gupta, S. M.: Quality Management in Product Recovery Using the Internet of Things: An Optimization Approach. In: Computers in Industry 65 (3), S. 491–504 (2014).
[17] Gros, S. u. a.: Agentbased, Hybrid Control Architecture for Optimized and Flexible Production Scheduling and Control in Remanufacturing. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 14 (2), (2020).
[18] French, R. u. a.: Intelligent Sensing for Robotic Re-Manufacturing in Aerospace: An Industry 4.0 Design-Based Prototype. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors (IRIS), S. 272–277 (2017).
[19] Ruggeri, S. u. a.: Micro-Robotic Handling Solutions for PCB (Re-)Manufacturing. In: Procedia Manufacturing 11, S. 441–448 (2017).
[20] Huang, J. u. a.: A Strategy for Human-Robot Collaboration in Taking Products Apart for Remanufacture. In: FME Transactions 47 (4), S. 731–738 (2019).
[21] Li, R. u. a.: Unfastening of Hexagonal Headed Screws by a Collaborative Robot. In: IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, S. 1-14 (2020).
[22] Gerbers, R. u. a.: Safe, Flexible and Productive Human-Robot-Collaboration for Disassembly of Lithium-Ion Batteries. In: Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management, Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries, S. 99-126 (2018).
[23] Bdiwi, M. u. a.: Autonomous Disassembly of Electric Vehicle Motors Based on Robot Cognition. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), S. 2500–2505 (2016).
[24] Jungbluth, J. u. a.: Demontage von Elektroantrieben mit Assistenzrobotern zum wirtschaftlichen Recycling. In: Tagungsband AALE 2016, S. 10 (2016).
[25] Vongbunyong, S. u. a.: Basic Behaviour Control of the Vision-Based Cognitive Robotic Disassembly Automation. In: Assembly Automation 33 (1), S. 38–56 (2013).
[26] Vongbunyong, S. u. a.: Learning and Revision in Cognitive Robotics Disassembly Automation. In: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 34, S. 79–94 (2015).
[27] Vongbunyong, S. u. a.: A Process Demonstration Platform for Product Disassembly Skills Transfer. In: Procedia CIRP 61, S. 281–286 (2017).
[28] Ries, S. u. a.: Demontageeffektor für Schraubverbindungen mit ungewissem Zustand. In: ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 115 (10), S. 711-714 (2020).
[29] Chang, M. u. a.: Interactive AR-Assisted Product Disassembly Sequence Planning (ARDIS). In: International Journal of Production Research 58 (16), S. 4916–4931 (2020).
[30] Chang, M. u. a.: AR-Guided Product Disassembly for Maintenance and Remanufacturing. In: Procedia CIRP 61, S. 299–304 (2017).
[31] Mircheski, I.; Rizov, T.: Improved Nondestructive Disassembly Process Using Augmented Reality and RFID Product/Part Tracking. In: TEM Journal 6 (4), S. 671–676 (2017).
[32] Bentaha, M. L. u. a.: Profit-Oriented Partial Disassembly Line Design: Dealing with Hazardous Parts and Task Processing Times Uncertainty. In: International Journal of Production Research 56 (24), S. 7220–7242 (2018).
[33] Liu, M. u. a.: Robust Disassembly Line Balancing with Ambiguous Task Processing Times. In: International Journal of Production Research 58 (19), S. 5806–5835 (2020).
[34] Meng, W.; Zhang, X.: Optimization of Remanufacturing Disassembly Line Balance Considering Multiple Failures and Material Hazards. In: Sustainability 12 (18), S. 7318 (2020).
[35] Tian, G. u. a.: Disassembly Sequence Planning Considering Fuzzy Component Quality and Varying Operational Cost. In: IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 15 (2), S. 748–760 (2018).
[36] Li, S. u. a.: Multi-Objective Disassembly Sequence Optimization Aiming at Quality Uncertainty of End-of-Life Product. In: IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 631 (3), S. 32015 (2019).
[37] Xia, X. u. a.: 3D-Based Multi-Objective Cooperative Disassembly Sequence Planning Method for Remanufacturing. In: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 106 (4), S. 4611–4622 (2020).
[38] Li, L. u. a.: An Integrated Approach of Reverse Engineering Aided Remanufacturing Process for Worn Components. In: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 48, S. 39–50 (2017).
[39] Zheng, Y. u. a.: A Primitive-Based 3D Reconstruction Method for Remanufacturing. In: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103 (4), S. 3667–3681 (2019).
[40] Khan, A. u. a.: Vision Guided Robotic Inspection for Parts in Manufacturing and Remanufacturing Industry. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 11 (6), S. 49-70 (2020).
[41] Schlüter, M. u. a.: Vision-Based Identification Service for Remanufacturing Sorting. In: Procedia Manufacturing 21, S. 384–391 (2018).
[42] Siddiqi, M. U. R. u. a.: Low Cost Three-Dimensional Virtual Model Construction for Remanufacturing Industry. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 9 (2), S. 129–139 (2019).
[43] Gibbons, Tom u. a.: A Gaussian Mixture Model for Automated Corrosion Detection in Remanufacturing. In: Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering 8, S. 63–68 (2018).
[44] Nwankpa, C. u. a.: Achieving Remanufacturing Inspection Using Deep Learning. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 11 (2), S. 89-105 (2020).

Your downloads


You might also be interested in

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

AI literacy as a prerequisite for augmentation
Uta Wilkens ORCID Icon, Valentin Langholf ORCID Icon, Niklas Obermann ORCID Icon
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) offers new opportunities for organizational knowledge management, particularly when it comes to learning processes at the interface between explicit, firm-specific, and tacit knowledge. Its use is therefore of particular interest for application areas such as industrial maintenance. Based on a mechanical engineering case study, this article demonstrates that augmenting both processes and employees with GenAI requires AI literacy combined with professional skills.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 118-126 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.14
Work Design in the Use of Autonomous Systems

Work Design in the Use of Autonomous Systems

Addressing the shortage of skilled workers
Tim Jeske ORCID Icon, Sascha Stowasser ORCID Icon, Nicole Ottersböck, Sebastian Terstegen, Rasmus Adler ORCID Icon
Companies are increasingly challenged to address shortages of skilled workers while meeting rising demands for productivity, flexibility, and innovation. Because labor supply can only be expanded to a limited extent, there is a growing focus on designing work systems with productivity in mind. Autonomous systems offer significant potential in this regard. Their implementation requires not only technical adjustments but, above all, changes in organization, skills, and work design. This article analyzes empirically grounded change requirements in existing work systems as well as associated economic potential.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 44-50 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.5
Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Requirements for AI-supported assistance in production and logistics
Bernd Kuhlenkötter ORCID Icon, Daniel Syniawa ORCID Icon
Foundation models are increasingly changing the way robots are used in industry. Instead of writing complex programs line by line, programmers will soon be able to collaborate more closely with AI systems, describe tasks, and review generated solutions. This shifts their role from purely generating code to conceptual, supervisory, and validation activities. This article highlights the new possibilities that large AI models create for robot programming and the changes they entail for work and required skills in industrial practice.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 16-23 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.2
AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

Implications for individual and organizational change
Katharina Hölzle ORCID Icon, Leonie Krauch, Wolfgang Beinhauer ORCID Icon, Carsten Schmidt, Josephine Hofmann ORCID Icon
Is it sufficient to train employees in the use of AI tools, or does the AI organization require an entirely new set of competencies? This paper introduces a digital enablement model comprising three competency dimensions and demonstrates, through an upskilling program implemented at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, how organizations can sustainably bridge the AI adoption gap.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 94-100 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.11
Designing Effective AI Certification

Designing Effective AI Certification

Insights from established certification domains for the standardization of human-centered AI
Katharina Morsch ORCID Icon
Certification for human-centered AI is becoming increasingly important—as a source of competitive differentiation, a response to regulatory expectations, and a mechanism for fostering human-centered work environments. But how can organizations determine whether the underlying requirements are truly embedded in practice? Drawing on expert interviews from established certification domains, this paper shows that the decisive question is answered not during the audit itself, but in the period between audit cycles. Ultimately, it is not the certificate that matters, but the commitment of organizational leadership and the organization as a whole to engage seriously in the certification process and its continuous implementation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 86-92 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.10
Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Towards an industrial platform for selection and configuration
Purushothaman Ganesh ORCID Icon, Baris E. Albayrak ORCID Icon, Jörg Franke ORCID Icon, Till Sindel ORCID Icon, Jens Fürst, Sebastian Lang ORCID Icon
Industrial supply chains must repeatedly reconfigure sourcing strategies in response to disruptions, yet supplier capability information remains heterogeneous and difficult to operationalize. Existing research addresses supplier selection, simulation, and interoperability standards separately, treating discovery, evaluation, and optimization as disconnected steps requiring manual data transformation. This paper presents a framework for a data-driven industrial platform integrating three components: Asset Administration Shell-based supplier profiles structured by an Actor-Service ontology for semantic discovery, automatic discrete-event simulation model generation from layout data for performance evaluation, and KPI-driven configuration using optimization algorithms. The main contributions are an end-to-end interoperable workflow, a two-tier supplier profile concept separating semantic descriptions from simulation parameters, and a standardized KPI interface maintaining consistency ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 50-61 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.6