Industry 4.0 in Remanufacturing

Analysis and evaluation of current research approaches

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 37, 2021, Edition 4, Pages 37-40
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_21-4_S37-40
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Remanufacturing, previously characterized by manual and cost-intensive processes, is a critical step on the way to a resource-efficient circular economy. Industry and research agree that the introduction of Industry 4.0 technologies is the key to the development of automated and economical remanufacturing systems. Based on a systematic literature review, this paper is dedicated to the analysis of promising Industry 4.0 approaches with a focus on the overall process as well as the sub-processes of disassembly and inspection. The results suggest that there is a need for additional knowledge, experience and research in the development and real demonstration of the approaches and their transferability to broader application fields.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Chakraborty, K. u. a.: A Study on Remanufacturing Possibility of a Product. In: Microsystem Technologies 25 (5), S. 1765–1770 (2019).
[2] Steinhilper, R.: Remanufacturing: The Ultimate Form of Recycling. Stuttgart (1998).
[3] Ijomah, W. L. u. a.: Development of Robust Design-for-Remanufacturing Guidelines to Further the Aims of Sustainable Development. In: International Journal of Production Research 45 (18-19), S. 4513–4536 (2007).
[4] Huang, W. u. a.: Remanufacturing Scheme Design for Used Parts Based on Incomplete Information Reconstruction. In: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 33 (5), 41 (2020).
[5] Kerin, M.; Pham, D. T.: Smart Remanufacturing: A Review and Research Framework. In: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 31 (6), S. 1205–1235 (2020).
[6] Yang, S. u. a.: Opportunities for Industry 4.0 to Support Remanufacturing. In: Applied Sciences 8 (7), S. 1177 (2018).
[7] Pistorius, J.: Industrie 4.0 – Schlüsseltechnologien fur die Produktion: Grundlagen, Potenziale, Anwendungen. Berlin, Heidelberg (2020).
[8] Sundin, E. u. a.: Design for Automatic End-of-Life Processes. In: Assembly Automation 32 (4), S. 389–398 (2012).
[9] Wang, X. u. a.: From Cloud Manufacturing to Cloud Remanufacturing: A Cloud-based Approach for WEEE Recovery. In: Manufacturing Letters 2 (4), S. 91-95 (2014).
[10] Wang, X. V.; Wang, L.: WRCloud: A Novel WEEE Remanufacturing Cloud System. In: Conference: Procedia CIRP 29, S. 786–791 (2015).
[11] Wang, X. V.; Wang, L.: Digital Twin-based WEEE Recycling, Recovery and Remanufacturing in the Background of Industry 4.0. In: International Journal of Production Research 57 (12), S. 3892–3902 (2019).
[12] Fang, H. C. u. a.: Use of Embedded Smart Sensors in Products to Facilitate Remanufacturing. In: Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, S. 3265–3290 (2015).
[13] Zhou, W.; Piramuthu, S.: Remanufacturing with RFID Item-level Information: Optimization, Waste Reduction and Quality Improvement. In: International Journal of Production Economics 145 (2), S. 647–657 (2013).
[14] Zhang, Y. u. a.: The ‘Internet of Things’ Enabled Real-Time Scheduling for Remanufacturing of Automobile Engines. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 185, S. 562–575 (2018).
[15] Okorie, O. u. a.: Towards a Simulation-Based Understanding of Smart Remanufacturing Operations: A Comparative Analysis. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 14 (2), (2020).
[16] Ondemir, O.; Gupta, S. M.: Quality Management in Product Recovery Using the Internet of Things: An Optimization Approach. In: Computers in Industry 65 (3), S. 491–504 (2014).
[17] Gros, S. u. a.: Agentbased, Hybrid Control Architecture for Optimized and Flexible Production Scheduling and Control in Remanufacturing. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 14 (2), (2020).
[18] French, R. u. a.: Intelligent Sensing for Robotic Re-Manufacturing in Aerospace: An Industry 4.0 Design-Based Prototype. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors (IRIS), S. 272–277 (2017).
[19] Ruggeri, S. u. a.: Micro-Robotic Handling Solutions for PCB (Re-)Manufacturing. In: Procedia Manufacturing 11, S. 441–448 (2017).
[20] Huang, J. u. a.: A Strategy for Human-Robot Collaboration in Taking Products Apart for Remanufacture. In: FME Transactions 47 (4), S. 731–738 (2019).
[21] Li, R. u. a.: Unfastening of Hexagonal Headed Screws by a Collaborative Robot. In: IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, S. 1-14 (2020).
[22] Gerbers, R. u. a.: Safe, Flexible and Productive Human-Robot-Collaboration for Disassembly of Lithium-Ion Batteries. In: Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management, Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries, S. 99-126 (2018).
[23] Bdiwi, M. u. a.: Autonomous Disassembly of Electric Vehicle Motors Based on Robot Cognition. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), S. 2500–2505 (2016).
[24] Jungbluth, J. u. a.: Demontage von Elektroantrieben mit Assistenzrobotern zum wirtschaftlichen Recycling. In: Tagungsband AALE 2016, S. 10 (2016).
[25] Vongbunyong, S. u. a.: Basic Behaviour Control of the Vision-Based Cognitive Robotic Disassembly Automation. In: Assembly Automation 33 (1), S. 38–56 (2013).
[26] Vongbunyong, S. u. a.: Learning and Revision in Cognitive Robotics Disassembly Automation. In: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 34, S. 79–94 (2015).
[27] Vongbunyong, S. u. a.: A Process Demonstration Platform for Product Disassembly Skills Transfer. In: Procedia CIRP 61, S. 281–286 (2017).
[28] Ries, S. u. a.: Demontageeffektor für Schraubverbindungen mit ungewissem Zustand. In: ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 115 (10), S. 711-714 (2020).
[29] Chang, M. u. a.: Interactive AR-Assisted Product Disassembly Sequence Planning (ARDIS). In: International Journal of Production Research 58 (16), S. 4916–4931 (2020).
[30] Chang, M. u. a.: AR-Guided Product Disassembly for Maintenance and Remanufacturing. In: Procedia CIRP 61, S. 299–304 (2017).
[31] Mircheski, I.; Rizov, T.: Improved Nondestructive Disassembly Process Using Augmented Reality and RFID Product/Part Tracking. In: TEM Journal 6 (4), S. 671–676 (2017).
[32] Bentaha, M. L. u. a.: Profit-Oriented Partial Disassembly Line Design: Dealing with Hazardous Parts and Task Processing Times Uncertainty. In: International Journal of Production Research 56 (24), S. 7220–7242 (2018).
[33] Liu, M. u. a.: Robust Disassembly Line Balancing with Ambiguous Task Processing Times. In: International Journal of Production Research 58 (19), S. 5806–5835 (2020).
[34] Meng, W.; Zhang, X.: Optimization of Remanufacturing Disassembly Line Balance Considering Multiple Failures and Material Hazards. In: Sustainability 12 (18), S. 7318 (2020).
[35] Tian, G. u. a.: Disassembly Sequence Planning Considering Fuzzy Component Quality and Varying Operational Cost. In: IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 15 (2), S. 748–760 (2018).
[36] Li, S. u. a.: Multi-Objective Disassembly Sequence Optimization Aiming at Quality Uncertainty of End-of-Life Product. In: IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 631 (3), S. 32015 (2019).
[37] Xia, X. u. a.: 3D-Based Multi-Objective Cooperative Disassembly Sequence Planning Method for Remanufacturing. In: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 106 (4), S. 4611–4622 (2020).
[38] Li, L. u. a.: An Integrated Approach of Reverse Engineering Aided Remanufacturing Process for Worn Components. In: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 48, S. 39–50 (2017).
[39] Zheng, Y. u. a.: A Primitive-Based 3D Reconstruction Method for Remanufacturing. In: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103 (4), S. 3667–3681 (2019).
[40] Khan, A. u. a.: Vision Guided Robotic Inspection for Parts in Manufacturing and Remanufacturing Industry. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 11 (6), S. 49-70 (2020).
[41] Schlüter, M. u. a.: Vision-Based Identification Service for Remanufacturing Sorting. In: Procedia Manufacturing 21, S. 384–391 (2018).
[42] Siddiqi, M. U. R. u. a.: Low Cost Three-Dimensional Virtual Model Construction for Remanufacturing Industry. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 9 (2), S. 129–139 (2019).
[43] Gibbons, Tom u. a.: A Gaussian Mixture Model for Automated Corrosion Detection in Remanufacturing. In: Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering 8, S. 63–68 (2018).
[44] Nwankpa, C. u. a.: Achieving Remanufacturing Inspection Using Deep Learning. In: Journal of Remanufacturing 11 (2), S. 89-105 (2020).

Your downloads


You might also be interested in

Serious Games as a Training Tool

Serious Games as a Training Tool

Game mechanics design to promote resilience
Annika Lange ORCID Icon, Thomas Knothe ORCID Icon
Unforeseen events are increasingly challenging manufacturing companies. Being resilient during crises is becoming a key competence. Serious games (SG) can help make resilience-building processes more transparent. This article derives specific requirements for SG from different phases of resilience and shows how these can be implemented in game mechanics in order to effectively support the training of resilience.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 98-104
From Brownfield to Industry 4.0

From Brownfield to Industry 4.0

Learning factories as training and testing environment for digital transformation
Jakob Weber, Sven Völker ORCID Icon
To succeed in their digital transformation, manufacturing companies need engineers with in-depth knowledge of key technologies and concepts, and a profound understanding of the transition from Industry 3.0 to Industry 4.0. This article describes the concept of a learning factory that is continuously subjected to a digital transformation, thereby creating an environment for the development of transformation competencies. The concept of digital transformation is based on digital worker assistance systems and multi-agent systems for production control. These enable the incremental integration of existing resources into the digitalized factory. The learning factory is not presented to students as a completed solution. Instead, it is continuously developed further as part of student projects. This way, it contributes directly to the qualification of personnel for the implementation of Industry 4.0.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 88-96
AI Colleagues?

AI Colleagues?

Competence requirements and training for AI use in industry
Swetlana Franken ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence is fundamentally changing tasks, roles, and skills in (industrial) companies. Increasingly, it acts as a colleague, preparing decisions, supporting processes, and interacting with people. This article highlights key competence requirements for AI use in industry, presents an integrated competence model, and outlines practical strategies for the transfer of skills. The aim is to prepare companies and employees for humane, competence-oriented AI implementation that combines technological efficiency with human creativity and judgment.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 78-86
Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId

Validating an interactive advisory tool in two manufacturing use cases
Pavlos Rath-Manakidis, Henry Huick, Björn Krämer ORCID Icon, Laurenz Wiskott ORCID Icon
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into workplace processes promises significant efficiency gains, yet organizations face numerous ethical challenges that stakeholders are often initially unaware of—from opacity in decision-making to algorithmic bias and premature automation risks. This paper presents the design and validation of tachAId, an interactive advisory tool aimed at embedding human-centered ethical considerations into the development of AI solutions. It reports on a validation study conducted across two distinct industrial AI applications with varying AI maturity. tachAId successfully directs attention to critical ethical considerations across the AI solution lifecycle that might be overlooked in technically-focused development. However, the findings also reveal a central tension: while effective in raising awareness, the tool’s non-linear design creates significant usability challenges, indicating a user preference for more structured, linear guidance, especially ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 50-59 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.48
AI Implementation in Industrial Quality Control

AI Implementation in Industrial Quality Control

A design science approach bridging technical and human factors
Erdi Ünal ORCID Icon, Kathrin Nauth ORCID Icon, Pavlos Rath-Manakidis, Jens Pöppelbuß ORCID Icon, Felix Hoenig, Christian Meske ORCID Icon
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant potential to enhance industrial quality control, yet successful implementation requires careful consideration of ethical and human factors. This article examines how automated surface inspection systems can be deployed to augment human capabilities while ensuring ethical integration into workflows. Through design science research, twelve stakeholders from six organizations across three continents are interviewed and twelve sociotechnical design requirements are derived. These are organized into pre-implementation and implementation/operation phases, addressing human agency, employee participation, and responsible knowledge management. Key findings include the critical importance of meaningful employee participation during pre-implementation, and maintaining human agency through experiential learning, building on existing expertise. This research contributes to ethical AI workplace implementation by providing guidelines that preserve human ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 120-127 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.112
Guidelines for the Fair Use of Generative AI

Guidelines for the Fair Use of Generative AI

Practical examples from production management and social welfare
Anja Gerlmaier, Paul-Fiete Kramer ORCID Icon, Dirk Marrenbach ORCID Icon, René Wenzel ORCID Icon
With the rapid spread of assistive AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot, companies are being challenged to address the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence. Based on two practical examples, this article provides insight into how companies can use company-specific risk and potential analyses to develop guidelines for the fair and responsible use of AI.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 22-28 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.1.22