Potentials of Digital Technologies in Scope 3-Carbon Accounting

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 39, 2023, Edition 2, Pages 29-32
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/IM_23-2_29-32
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Climate change is one of the biggest challenges facing companies. To be able to define strategies for decarbonizing their business activities, companies need to start accounting for their emissions. Calculating Scope 3 emissions is a complex, resource- intensive, and often imprecise process for companies. By using digital technologies, Scope 3 carbon accounting can become more transparent, efficient, and secure. This article highlights the potential of digital technologies in Scope 3 carbon accounting.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Talbot, D.; Boiral, O.: GHG Reporting and Impression Management: An Assessment of Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector. In: Journal of Business Ethics 147 (2018) 2, S. 367–83.
[2] Csutora, M.; Harangozo, G.: Twenty years of carbon accounting and auditing – a review and outlook. In: Society and Economy 39 (2017) 4, S. 459–80.
[3] Huang, Y. A.; Weber, C. L.; Matthews, H. S.: Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. In: Environmental science & technology 43 (2009) 22, S. 8509–15.
[4] WRI; WBCSD: Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard. URL: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/ standards/Corporate-Value-Chain-Accounting-Reporting-Standard_041613_2.pdf. Abrufdatum 09.11.2022.
[5] Schmidt, M.; Nill, M.; Scholz, J.: Die Bedeutung der Lieferkette für den Klimafußabdruck von Unternehmen. In: Chemie Ingenieur Technik 93 (2021) 11, S. 1692–706.
[6] Harbich, H.-D.; See, B. von; Lodemann, S.; Kuhnle, R.; Kersten, W.: Digital Scope 3 Carbon Accounting. Vision, Challenges, and Future Direction. In: Biedermann, H.; Posch, W.; Vorbach, S. (Hrsg.): Digitalisierung im Kontext von Nachhaltigkeit und Klimawandel 2021.
[7] WBCSD: Pathfinder Framework. Guidance for the Accounting and Exchange of Product Life Cycle Emissions. URL: https://www.wbcsd.org/contentwbc/download/13299/194600/1. Abrufdatum 06.11.2022.
[8] Melville,N.P.;Whisnant,R.:Energy and Carbon Management Systems. In: Journal of Industrial Ecology 18 (2014) 6, S. 920–30.
[9] Harangozo, G.; Szigeti, C.: Corporate carbon footprint analysis in practice – With a special focus on validity and reliability issues. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 167 (2017), S. 1177–83.
[10]  Bütow, K.; Davina König, L.; Vötsch, M.: Softwarelösungen für das Umwelt- und Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement.
[11]  Patchell, J.: Can the implications of the GHG Protocol’s scope 3 standard be realized? In: Journal of Cleaner Production 185 (2018), S. 941–58.
[12]  Asif, M. S.; Lau, H.; Nakandala, D.; Fan, Y.; Hurriyet, H.: Case study research of green life cycle model for the evaluation and reduction of scope 3 emissions in food supply chains. In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29 (2022) 4, S. 1050–66.
[13]  Royo, B.: Measuring and Allocating Scope 3 GHG Emissions. In: Müller, B.; Meyer, G. (Hrsg.): Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe 2. Enablers of Inclusive, Seamless and Sustainable Mobility. Cham 2020.
[14]  Xing, K.; Qian, W.; Zaman, A. U.: Development of a cloud-based platform for footprint assessment in green supply chain management. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 139 (2016), S. 191–203.
[15]  Rusch, M.; Schöggl, J.-P.; Baumgartner, R. J.: Application of digital technologies for sustainable product management in a circular economy: A review. In: Business Strategy and the Environment (2022).
[16] Cole, R.; Stevenson, M.; Aitken, J.: Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management. In: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 24 (2019) 4, S. 469–83.
[17] Tang, Q.; Tang, L. M.: Toward a Distributed Carbon Ledger for Carbon Emissions Trading and Accounting for Corporate Carbon Management. In: Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 16 (2019) 1, S. 37–46.
[18] Lee, S.-Y.: Drivers for the participation of small and medium‐sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives. In: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13 (2008) 3, S. 185–98.
[19] Garrido-Hidalgo, C.; Olivares, T.; Ramirez, F. J.; Roda-Sanchez, L.: An end-to-end Internet of Things solution for Reverse Supply Chain Management in Industry 4.0. In: Computers in Industry 112 (2019), S. 103127.
[20] Martindale, W.: Connecting food supply chains. In: Food Science and Technology 36 (2022) 3, S. 28–32.
[21] Serafeim, G.; Velez Caicedo, G.: Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Scope 3 Carbon Emissions. In: SSRN Electronic Journal (2022).

Your downloads


You might also be interested in

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

AI literacy as a prerequisite for augmentation
Uta Wilkens ORCID Icon, Valentin Langholf ORCID Icon, Niklas Obermann ORCID Icon
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) offers new opportunities for organizational knowledge management, particularly when it comes to learning processes at the interface between explicit, firm-specific, and tacit knowledge. Its use is therefore of particular interest for application areas such as industrial maintenance. Based on a mechanical engineering case study, this article demonstrates that augmenting both processes and employees with GenAI requires AI literacy combined with professional skills.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 118-126 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.14
Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Requirements for AI-supported assistance in production and logistics
Bernd Kuhlenkötter ORCID Icon, Daniel Syniawa ORCID Icon
Foundation models are increasingly changing the way robots are used in industry. Instead of writing complex programs line by line, programmers will soon be able to collaborate more closely with AI systems, describe tasks, and review generated solutions. This shifts their role from purely generating code to conceptual, supervisory, and validation activities. This article highlights the new possibilities that large AI models create for robot programming and the changes they entail for work and required skills in industrial practice.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 16-23 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.2
AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

Implications for individual and organizational change
Katharina Hölzle ORCID Icon, Leonie Krauch, Wolfgang Beinhauer ORCID Icon, Carsten Schmidt, Josephine Hofmann ORCID Icon
Is it sufficient to train employees in the use of AI tools, or does the AI organization require an entirely new set of competencies? This paper introduces a digital enablement model comprising three competency dimensions and demonstrates, through an upskilling program implemented at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, how organizations can sustainably bridge the AI adoption gap.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 94-100 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.11
Designing Effective AI Certification

Designing Effective AI Certification

Insights from established certification domains for the standardization of human-centered AI
Katharina Morsch ORCID Icon
Certification for human-centered AI is becoming increasingly important—as a source of competitive differentiation, a response to regulatory expectations, and a mechanism for fostering human-centered work environments. But how can organizations determine whether the underlying requirements are truly embedded in practice? Drawing on expert interviews from established certification domains, this paper shows that the decisive question is answered not during the audit itself, but in the period between audit cycles. Ultimately, it is not the certificate that matters, but the commitment of organizational leadership and the organization as a whole to engage seriously in the certification process and its continuous implementation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 86-92 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.10
Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Towards an industrial platform for selection and configuration
Purushothaman Ganesh ORCID Icon, Baris E. Albayrak ORCID Icon, Jörg Franke ORCID Icon, Till Sindel ORCID Icon, Jens Fürst, Sebastian Lang ORCID Icon
Industrial supply chains must repeatedly reconfigure sourcing strategies in response to disruptions, yet supplier capability information remains heterogeneous and difficult to operationalize. Existing research addresses supplier selection, simulation, and interoperability standards separately, treating discovery, evaluation, and optimization as disconnected steps requiring manual data transformation. This paper presents a framework for a data-driven industrial platform integrating three components: Asset Administration Shell-based supplier profiles structured by an Actor-Service ontology for semantic discovery, automatic discrete-event simulation model generation from layout data for performance evaluation, and KPI-driven configuration using optimization algorithms. The main contributions are an end-to-end interoperable workflow, a two-tier supplier profile concept separating semantic descriptions from simulation parameters, and a standardized KPI interface maintaining consistency ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 50-61 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.6
Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

How collaboration shapes sovereignty and interoperability across industrial applications
Anna Maria Schleimer ORCID Icon, Julia Pampus ORCID Icon
From automotive supply chains to smart factories, data ecosystems promise seamless collaboration across company boundaries. But how can industries build the necessary infrastructure without creating new dependencies? This article explores how open-source software can serve as a foundation and impactful tool for sovereign, interoperable technologies and standards. Yet, open-source software is not a silver bullet; rather, it poses challenges for digital sovereignty in burgeoning data ecosystems.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 6-13 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.1