Digitization of German SMEs across Industries

Why Companies Should Look Closely at Competencies

JournalIndustrie 4.0 Management
Issue Volume 34, 2018, Edition 2, Pages 38-42
Open Accesshttps://doi.org/10.30844/I40M18-2_38-42
Bibliography Share Cite Download

Abstract

Digitization has a considerable impact on companies and their business environment. With extensive digital pilot projects and digitization programs, large corporations show that they are increasingly internalizing the digital transformation. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), on the other hand, often have a need to catch up. In addition to the technical aspects of digital transformation, the human factor is playing an increasingly important role. With the help of a cross-sectional analysis of German SMEs, findings on digitization competence were derived and analyzed across industries. The term work 4.0 was divided into the dimensions of qualification, organization and leadership and these were considered as influencing factors. In individual industries, there are clear deficits in the area of digitization competence. It shows that these competences depend to a large extent on the dimensions of the work 4.0.

Keywords


Bibliography

[1] Destatis: Anteile kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen an ausgewählten Merkmalen. URL: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesamtwirtschaftUmwelt/UnternehmenHandwerk/KleineMittlereUnternehmenMittelstand/Tabellen/Insgesamt.html. Abrufdatum 05.02.2018.
[2] Siepmann, D.; Graef, N.: Industrie 4.0 – Grundlagen und Gesamtzusammenhang. In: Roth, A. (Hrsg): Einführung und Umsetzung von Industrie 4.0. Grundlagen, Vorgehensmodell und Use Cases aus der Praxis. Berlin Heidelberg 2016.
[3] Schlund, S.; Pokorni, B.: Industrie 4.0 ‒ Wo steht die Revolutions der Arbeitsgestaltung? Ulm Stuttgart 2016.
[4] Barth, H.: Digitalisierung im deutschen Mittelstand. 2017.
[5] Mohr, N.; Morawiak, D.; Köster, N.; Saß, B.: Die Digitalisierung des deutschen Mittelstands. 2017.
[6] Mochmann, E.: Quantitative Daten für die Sekundäranalyse. In: Baur, N.; Blasius, J. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden 2014.
[7] IfM Bonn: KMU-Definition des IfM Bonn. URL: https://www.ifm-bonn.org/definitionen/kmu-definition-des-ifm-bonn/, Abrufdatum 08.11.2017.
[8] Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis): Gliederung der Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige. Ausgabe 2008 (WZ 2008). Wiesbaden 2007.
[9] El Sawy, O. A.; Malhotra, A.; Park, Y.; Pavlou, P. A.: Research Commentary ‒ Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics. It Takes Three to Tango. In: Information Systems Research 21 (2010) 4, S. 835–48.
[10] Ludwig, T.; Kotthaus, C.; Stein, M.; Durt, H.; Kurz, C.; Wenz, J.; Doublet, T.; Becker, M.; Pipek, V.; Wulf, V.: Arbeiten im Mittelstand 4.0–KMU im Spannungsfeld des digitalen Wandels. In: HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 53 (2016) 1, S. 71-86.
[11] Staudt, E.: Kompetenz und Innovation. In: Clermont, A.; Schmeisser, W.; Krimphove, D. (Hrsg): Personalführung und Organisation 2015.
[12] Probst, G.; Raub, S.; Romhardt, K.: Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen, 7. Aufl. . Wiesbaden 2013.
[13] Pawlowsky, P.; Gerlach, L.; Hauptmann, S.; Puggel, A.: Wissen als Wettbewerbsvorteil in kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen – Empirische Typologisierungen auf Grundlage einer bundesweiten Befragung. In: FOKUS prints 09 (2006).
[14] Bland, J. M.; Altman, D. G.: Statistics notes. Cronbach‘s alpha. In: BMJ 314 (1997) 7080, S. 572.
[15] Tropf, T. M.; Miosga, J.: Der Handel digitalisiert sich nur langsam. URL: https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/Der-Handel-digitalisiert-sich-nur-langsam.html, Abrufdatum 08.11.2017.
[16] Kersten, W.; Seiter, M.; von See, B.; Hackius, N.; Maurer, T.: Trends und Strategien in Logistik und Supply Chain Management. Chancen der digitalen Transformation. Bremen 2017.
[17] Bauernhansl, T.; Emmrich, V.: Geschäftsmodellinnovation durch Industrie 4.0. Chancen und Risiken für den Maschinen- und Anlagenbau. München 2015.
[18] Staudt, E.; Kriegsmann, B.: Technische Entwicklung und Innovation. In: Kahsnitz, D.; Ropohl, G.; Schmid, A. (Hrsg): Handbuch zur Arbeitslehre. München 1997.
[19] Ropohl, G.: Allgemeine Technologie. Eine Systemtheorie der Technik Karlsruhe 2009.
[20] von See, B.; Kersten, W.: Digitale Transformation des Arbeitsumfelds. Identifikation und Analyse von Handlungsfeldern in Unternehmen am Beispiel der Logistik. In: Gronau, N. (Hrsg): Industrial Internet of Things in der Arbeits- und Betriebsorganisation. Berlin 2017.
[21] Reker, J.; Böhm, K.: Digitalisierung im Mittelstand. 2013.
[22] https://www.kompetenzzentrum-hamburg.digital/.
[23] Delfmann, W.; Hompel, M. ten; Kersten, W.; Schmidt, T.; Stölzle, W.: Logistik als Wissenschaft in Zeiten der vierten industriellen Revolution. Positionspapier des Wissenschatlichen Beirats der Bundesvereinigung Logistik (BVL). Bremen 2017.

Your downloads


Potentials: Leadership

You might also be interested in

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

Generative AI in Organizational Knowledge Management

AI literacy as a prerequisite for augmentation
Uta Wilkens ORCID Icon, Valentin Langholf ORCID Icon, Niklas Obermann ORCID Icon
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) offers new opportunities for organizational knowledge management, particularly when it comes to learning processes at the interface between explicit, firm-specific, and tacit knowledge. Its use is therefore of particular interest for application areas such as industrial maintenance. Based on a mechanical engineering case study, this article demonstrates that augmenting both processes and employees with GenAI requires AI literacy combined with professional skills.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 118-126 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.14
Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Foundation Models in Industrial Robotics

Requirements for AI-supported assistance in production and logistics
Bernd Kuhlenkötter ORCID Icon, Daniel Syniawa ORCID Icon
Foundation models are increasingly changing the way robots are used in industry. Instead of writing complex programs line by line, programmers will soon be able to collaborate more closely with AI systems, describe tasks, and review generated solutions. This shifts their role from purely generating code to conceptual, supervisory, and validation activities. This article highlights the new possibilities that large AI models create for robot programming and the changes they entail for work and required skills in industrial practice.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 16-23 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.2
AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

AI-Driven Organization as a New Work Paradigm

Implications for individual and organizational change
Katharina Hölzle ORCID Icon, Leonie Krauch, Wolfgang Beinhauer ORCID Icon, Carsten Schmidt, Josephine Hofmann ORCID Icon
Is it sufficient to train employees in the use of AI tools, or does the AI organization require an entirely new set of competencies? This paper introduces a digital enablement model comprising three competency dimensions and demonstrates, through an upskilling program implemented at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, how organizations can sustainably bridge the AI adoption gap.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 94-100 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.5.11
Designing Effective AI Certification

Designing Effective AI Certification

Insights from established certification domains for the standardization of human-centered AI
Katharina Morsch ORCID Icon
Certification for human-centered AI is becoming increasingly important—as a source of competitive differentiation, a response to regulatory expectations, and a mechanism for fostering human-centered work environments. But how can organizations determine whether the underlying requirements are truly embedded in practice? Drawing on expert interviews from established certification domains, this paper shows that the decisive question is answered not during the audit itself, but in the period between audit cycles. Ultimately, it is not the certificate that matters, but the commitment of organizational leadership and the organization as a whole to engage seriously in the certification process and its continuous implementation.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 5 | Pages 86-92 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.10
Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Data-Driven Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0

Towards an industrial platform for selection and configuration
Purushothaman Ganesh ORCID Icon, Baris E. Albayrak ORCID Icon, Jörg Franke ORCID Icon, Till Sindel ORCID Icon, Jens Fürst, Sebastian Lang ORCID Icon
Industrial supply chains must repeatedly reconfigure sourcing strategies in response to disruptions, yet supplier capability information remains heterogeneous and difficult to operationalize. Existing research addresses supplier selection, simulation, and interoperability standards separately, treating discovery, evaluation, and optimization as disconnected steps requiring manual data transformation. This paper presents a framework for a data-driven industrial platform integrating three components: Asset Administration Shell-based supplier profiles structured by an Actor-Service ontology for semantic discovery, automatic discrete-event simulation model generation from layout data for performance evaluation, and KPI-driven configuration using optimization algorithms. The main contributions are an end-to-end interoperable workflow, a two-tier supplier profile concept separating semantic descriptions from simulation parameters, and a standardized KPI interface maintaining consistency ...
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 50-61 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.6
Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

Open Source as Enabler for Smart Data Ecosystems

How collaboration shapes sovereignty and interoperability across industrial applications
Anna Maria Schleimer ORCID Icon, Julia Pampus ORCID Icon
From automotive supply chains to smart factories, data ecosystems promise seamless collaboration across company boundaries. But how can industries build the necessary infrastructure without creating new dependencies? This article explores how open-source software can serve as a foundation and impactful tool for sovereign, interoperable technologies and standards. Yet, open-source software is not a silver bullet; rather, it poses challenges for digital sovereignty in burgeoning data ecosystems.
Industry 4.0 Science | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 4 | Pages 6-13 | DOI 10.30844/I4SE.26.4.1