{"id":103564,"date":"2024-02-20T12:39:38","date_gmt":"2024-02-20T11:39:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/?page_id=103564"},"modified":"2025-02-10T17:18:57","modified_gmt":"2025-02-10T16:18:57","slug":"artificial-intelligence","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/artificial-intelligence\/","title":{"rendered":"Artificial Intelligence"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n
\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"AI\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

AI Colleagues?<\/h4>\n
Competence requirements and training for AI use in industry<\/div>
Swetlana Franken<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n
\n\t\t\t \n\t\t\t <\/div>Artificial intelligence is fundamentally changing tasks, roles, and skills in (industrial) companies. Increasingly, it acts as a colleague, preparing decisions, supporting processes, and interacting with people. This article highlights key competence requirements for AI use in industry, presents an integrated competence model, and outlines practical strategies for the transfer of skills. The aim is to prepare companies and employees for humane, competence-oriented AI implementation that combines technological efficiency with human creativity and judgment. <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 2 | Pages 78-86<\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"Data\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

Data Quality and Domain Expertise for Resilient AI Deployment<\/h4>\n
Integrating anomaly and label error detection in industry<\/div>
Pavlos Rath-Manakidis<\/a>, Henry Huick<\/a>, Erdi \u00dcnal<\/a>, Bj\u00f6rn Kr\u00e4mer<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Laurenz Wiskott<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n AI implementation transforms work and worker-technology relationships in industrial quality control. This paper explores how approaches to data quality and model transparency support ethical AI deployment, fostering worker agency, trust, and sustainable work design in automatic surface inspection systems (ASIS). Recurring problems like data inefficiency, variable model confidence, and limited AI expertise point to key challenges of human-centered AI: user trust, agency and responsible data management. A solution co-developed with an ASIS supplier demonstrates that the challenges extend beyond the purely technical, underscoring the value of AI design that augments human capabilities. Technical solutions such as anomaly, label error, and domain drift detection are proposed to enhance data quality and model reliability. The insights emphasize the following generalizable strategies for resilient AI integration: understanding user-reported problems through a human-AI interaction lens, ... <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | Edition 1 | Pages 128-135 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.120<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"Operationalizing\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

Operationalizing Ethical AI with tachAId<\/h4>\n
Validating an interactive advisory tool in two manufacturing use cases<\/div>
Pavlos Rath-Manakidis<\/a>, Henry Huick<\/a>, Bj\u00f6rn Kr\u00e4mer<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Laurenz Wiskott<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into workplace processes promises significant efficiency gains, yet organizations face numerous ethical challenges that stakeholders are often initially unaware of\u2014from opacity in decision-making to algorithmic bias and premature automation risks. This paper presents the design and validation of tachAId, an interactive advisory tool aimed at embedding human-centered ethical considerations into the development of AI solutions. It reports on a validation study conducted across two distinct industrial AI applications with varying AI maturity. tachAId successfully directs attention to critical ethical considerations across the AI solution lifecycle that might be overlooked in technically-focused development. However, the findings also reveal a central tension: while effective in raising awareness, the tool\u2019s non-linear design creates significant usability challenges, indicating a user preference for more structured, linear guidance, especially ... <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 50-59 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.48<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"Digital\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

Digital Competence Lab (DCL) for Speech Therapy<\/h4>\n
Designing a learning platform to advance digital skills<\/div>
Anika Thurmann<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Antonia Weirich<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Kerstin Bilda<\/a>, Fiona D\u00f6rr<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Lars T\u00f6nges<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n The digital transformation of healthcare results in lasting changes in speech therapy. Smart technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) are creating new opportunities to ensure therapy quality, address care bottlenecks, and actively involve patients in exercise processes. At the same time, these developments are expanding the role of speech therapists, who increasingly use digital systems as supportive tools in addition to their core therapeutic tasks. Based on a feasibility study of the AI-supported application ISi-Speech-Sprechen in a real-world setting of complex Parkinson's therapy (PKT), this article outlines the key challenges associated with implementing smart technologies. <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 110-118 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.102<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"AI\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

AI Implementation in Industrial Quality Control<\/h4>\n
A design science approach bridging technical and human factors<\/div>
Erdi \u00dcnal<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Kathrin Nauth<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Pavlos Rath-Manakidis<\/a>, Jens P\u00f6ppelbu\u00df<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Felix Hoenig<\/a>, Christian Meske<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant potential to enhance industrial quality control, yet successful implementation requires careful consideration of ethical and human factors. This article examines how automated surface inspection systems can be deployed to augment human capabilities while ensuring ethical integration into workflows. Through design science research, twelve stakeholders from six organizations across three continents are interviewed and twelve sociotechnical design requirements are derived. These are organized into pre-implementation and implementation\/operation phases, addressing human agency, employee participation, and responsible knowledge management. Key findings include the critical importance of meaningful employee participation during pre-implementation, and maintaining human agency through experiential learning, building on existing expertise. This research contributes to ethical AI workplace implementation by providing guidelines that preserve human ... <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 120-127 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.112<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"Guidelines\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

Guidelines for the Fair Use of Generative AI<\/h4>\n
Practical examples from production management and social welfare<\/div>
Anja Gerlmaier<\/a>, Paul-Fiete Kramer<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Dirk Marrenbach<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Ren\u00e9 Wenzel<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n With the rapid spread of assistive AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot, companies are being challenged to address the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence. Based on two practical examples, this article provides insight into how companies can use company-specific risk and potential analyses to develop guidelines for the fair and responsible use of AI. <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 22-28 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.22<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"XAI\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

XAI for Predicting and Nudging Worker Decision-Making<\/h4>\n
Feasibility and perceived ethical issues<\/div>
Jan-Phillip Herrmann<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Catharina Baier<\/a>, Sven Tackenberg<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Verena Nitsch<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)-based nudging, while ethically complex, may offer a favorable alternative to rigid, algorithmically generated schedules that simultaneously respects worker autonomy and improves overall scheduling performance on the shop floor. This paper presents a controlled laboratory study demonstrating the successful nudging of 28 industrial engineering students in a job shop simulation. The study shows that the observed concordance between students\u2019 sequencing decisions and a predefined target sequence increases by 9% through nudging. This is done by using XAI to analyze students\u2019 preferences and adjusting task deadlines and priorities in the simulation. The paper discusses the ethical issues of nudging, including potential manipulation, illusory autonomy, and reducing people to numbers. To mitigate these issues, it offers recommendations for implementing the XAI-based nudging approach in practice and highlights its strengths relative to rigid, ... <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 70-78<\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"Improving\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

Improving Documentation Quality and Creating Time for Core Activities<\/h4>\n
Success factors for implementing AI-based documentation systems in nursing care<\/div>
Sophie Berretta<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Elisabeth Liedmann<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Paul-Fiete Kramer<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Anja Gerlmaier<\/a>, Christopher Schmidt<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n Demographic change is accompanied by both a growing demand for care and a shortage of qualified nursing staff. Consequently, AI-based technologies are increasingly becoming a focus of care-related innovations. Their aim is to reduce workload pressure, save time, and enhance the attractiveness of the nursing profession. Using the example of AI-supported documentation systems for admission interviews, this article examines to what extent such systems can contribute to improvements in work processes and care quality, focusing on the perspectives of nursing professionals and nursing experts. The results indicate potential for workload relief, enhanced documentation quality, and the reallocation of time resources toward direct patient care. However, realizing these potentials requires a human-centered and context-sensitive implementation approach. <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 154-160 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.146<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"JOCAT\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

JOCAT (Job Change Acceptance Toolbox)<\/h4>\n
A change management approach for implementing AI systems ethically and sustainably<\/div>
Sophie Berretta<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Pauline Nolte<\/a>, Annette Kluge<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Skrolan Kopka<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n AI systems challenge conventional change management due to their dynamic, opaque, and ethically sensitive nature. This article applies insights from established change models to AI-specific challenges, illustrated by a real-world use case. The resulting propositions are substantiated by six expert interviews, which integrate practical perspectives. Together, they inform the development of the Job Change Acceptance Toolbox (JOCAT), a modular, practice-oriented resource designed to support the implementation of human-centered, ethical, and sustainable AI-related change processes. <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | Edition 1 | Pages 80-91 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.74<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n \n \n \"Applied\n <\/picture>\n <\/div>\n
\n \t \n
\t\t

Applied AI for Human-Centric Assembly Workplace Design<\/h4>\n
An ethics-informed approach<\/div>
Tadele Belay Tuli<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Michael Jonek<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a>, Sascha Niethammer<\/a>, Henning Vogler<\/a>, Martin Manns<\/a> \n \"ORCID<\/a><\/div>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n
\n Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance smart assembly by predicting human motion and adapting workplace design. Using probabilistic models such as Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs), AI systems anticipate operator actions to improve coordination with robots. However, these predictive systems raise ethical concerns related to safety, fairness, and privacy under the EU AI Act, which classifies them as high-risk. This paper presents a conceptual method integrating probabilistic motion modeling with ethical evaluation via Z-Inspection\u00ae. An industrial case study using the Smart Work Assistant (SWA) demonstrates how multimodal sensing (motion, gaze) and interpretable models enable anticipatory assistance. The approach moves from ethics evaluation to ethics-informed work design, yielding transferable principles and a configurable assessment matrix that supports compliance-by-design in collaborative assembly. <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
Industry 4.0 Science<\/strong> | Volume 42 | 2026 | Edition 1 | Pages 60-68 | DOI 10.30844\/I4SE.26.1.58<\/a><\/div> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
1<\/span>\n2<\/a>\n…<\/span>\n15<\/a>\n\u00bb<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":455,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-103564","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"front-page-entry":false,"post-entry":false,"post-teaser":false,"post-teaser-mobile":false,"post-custom-size":false,"whitepaper-teaser":false,"card-big":false,"card-portrait":false,"card-big-company":false,"gp-listing":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"woocommerce_thumbnail":false,"woocommerce_single":false,"woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail":false,"dgwt-wcas-product-suggestion":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Florian Goldmann","author_link":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/author\/florian-goldmanngito-verlag-de\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/103564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/455"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103564"}],"version-history":[{"count":27,"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/103564\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":107776,"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/103564\/revisions\/107776"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}