{"id":109146,"date":"2025-06-12T22:13:03","date_gmt":"2025-06-12T20:13:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/?post_type=article&p=109146"},"modified":"2025-06-27T12:07:48","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T10:07:48","slug":"digital-twins-in-logistics","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/en\/articles\/digital-twins-in-logistics\/","title":{"rendered":"Digital Twins in Logistics"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Digital Twin systems in logistics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Supply disruptions, increasing complexity and strict sustainability requirements are adding external pressure on companies and presenting global supply chains with new challenges [1, 2, 3]. As a driver of industrial change, digitalization offers enormous potential for enhanced competitiveness. In logistics in particular, as a key function for fulfilling customer orders, digital technologies are creating new opportunities for more efficiency, flexibility and transparency [4].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One promising concept is the Digital Twin (DT), which virtually maps real systems and enables measures to be simulated prior to implementation. In logistics, these are referred to as Digital Supply Chain Twins (DSCT). DSCT facilitate optimization efforts on all levels\u2014from individual locations to global networks (Fig. 1<\/strong>). DSCT are defined as \u201ca digital simulation model<\/a> of a real logistics system with a long-term, bidirectional and timely data connection\u201d [5]. They create the basis for data-based decisions and provide a holistic overview of the customer order process. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Changes in the logistics system influence the DT and vice versa (bidirectional), whereby the exchange takes place flexibly and not necessarily in near real-time depending on the application (timely). DSCT are designed for continuous, long-term use and therefore differ from short-lived project models (long-term). Forecasts such as the DHL Logistics Trend Radar project that DSCT will be increasingly used in coming years [6]. In practice, however, it remains unclear to what extent companies are already prepared for the introduction of this technology and what challenges are associated with its implementation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Figure
Figure 1: Levels of the DSCT.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

To address these questions, the digital maturity of companies regarding DSCT was examined as part of a workshop with industry experts. The aim was to determine the status quo of technology application in the companies represented, identify key challenges, discuss potential fields of application and align the findings with current research. The workshop was divided into two phases for this purpose: In the first phase, a survey [7] was conducted to investigate existing DSCT projects, while in the second phase\u2014using the placemat method [8, 9]\u2014expert assessments on selected topics were queried and discussed in depth. The following sections present the results of this study.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Status quo in industry<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The survey set out to systematically record the current development status of DSCT in the companies represented. It was designed in such a way that a separate questionnaire was completed for each identified project. This ensured a detailed survey of project-specific characteristics. Nine experts took part in the survey. While four companies had no DSCT projects to date, five experts reported on a total of seven projects (Fig. 2<\/strong>). All of these projects were implemented or planned in large companies with more than 249 employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The analysis of project progress indicates that the majority of DSCT initiatives are still at an early stage. One project is already in operational use, another is being implemented, while five projects are still in the planning phase. In addition to the development status, the fulfillment of the scientific DSCT criteria according to Gerlach et al. was also examined. Two of the seven projects fully meet the defined requirements in terms of longevity, timelinessand bidirectionality. In contrast, the remaining projects show deviations in at least one of these characteristics. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In terms of areas of application, the projects can be divided into two groups. Four projects are situated at site level, while the remaining three projects pursue an overarching network perspective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Figure
Figure 2: Results of the expert survey.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The low number of realized projects and the high proportion of projects that are still in the planning phase (Fig. 2<\/strong>) indicate that, although the technology is generally seen as promising, numerous challenges remain. Due to the low market penetration of DSCT technologies, further phases of the investigation took an explorative perspective, focusing on experts with many years of experience in the fields of logistics and digitalization. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lieu of a large, statistically representative sample, a qualitative, theory-based selection was made in order to gather fundamental assessments of the current status of DSCT technology in practice. As part of a systematic and structured analysis according to Mayring (2014), opinions from practice were evaluated in connection with current research [10, 11, 12]. Thanks to the early theoretical saturation of the experts\u2019 statements, it was possible to derive practical and valid findings despite the small sample size.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges and applications of current DSCT industrial projects<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The assessments of the industry experts were collected in the second workshop phase using the placemat method [8, 9] and similarities and differences were identified in the discussion. The survey focused on three central questions: the main implementation barriers, the framework conditions for data exchange and the fields of application of DSCT projects. The results of these discussions and assessments are presented below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Companies face a number of economic, organizational and technical challenges when implementing DSCT. There is a clear consensus that business viability and financial incentives are decisive factors in making investment decisions for DSCT projects. To do justice to the high degree of digitalization of DSCT, existing processes and interfaces must be comprehensively adapted, which requires considerable organizational effort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, according to the results of the placemat method, the key challenges are of a technical nature. In particular, the availability and quality of the required data were identified as critical factors. Fragmented IT landscapes and inconsistent data standards make seamless integration into DSCT difficult. In particular, the willingness to exchange data across companies represents a barriers. The experts agree that the success of DSCT depends largely on whether companies are willing to share relevant data with their partners within the value creation network. This necessity is also emphasized in current research [13, 14]. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

One approach to meeting information sharing requirements is the establishment of data ecosystems in both polycentric and pyramidal-hierarchical value creation networks [15]. While polycentric networks place particular demands on trust, interoperability and cooperative governance due to the equal structure of the actors, pyramidal-hierarchical networks face challenges in dealing with asymmetric power relations and ensuring data sovereignty vis-\u00e0-vis dominant partners [15, 16].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition to the challenges already listed regarding the availability and quality of data, the experts also highlight the barriers in cross-company collaborations. In particular, legal uncertainties, confidentiality concerns and a lack of standards between companies must be resolved jointly. The discussion made it clear that clear framework conditions for data exchange must be created for the successful implementation of DSCT. Standardized interfaces, contractual agreements as well as economic incentives for data provision were discussed as potential solutions. Standardized interfaces enable data exchange, while contractual and economic incentives aim to add value for all stakeholders and promote cooperation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition to the challenges, promising fields of application for DSCT were identified and evaluated. To systematically analyze and prioritize the use cases of DSCT in these areas, a four-quadrant matrix was developed based on their assessment (Fig. 3<\/strong>). Individual use cases were grouped thematically and presented as logarithmically scaled circles according to the average frequency of mentions and the benefit assessment of the respective group. This enables a classification in the dimensions expected usefulness<\/em> and number of mentions<\/em>. Four categories can be derived from this analysis:<\/p>\n\n\n\n