![\"Abstraction](\"https:\/\/industry-science.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Screen-Shot-2024-03-28-at-5.55.03-PM.png\")
There is only limited automated response to unforeseen process sequences and errors (complex error handling is difficult to implement). When it comes to the advantages of Robotic Process Automation, the low technical barriers and lack of programming knowledge required of users are repeatedly emphasized. However, implementing RPA exclusively on the presentation tier also has certain disadvantages. Since the software only interacts with the programs once they are in a human-readable format, RPA eliminates the need for the multi-tier network communication relied upon by traditional applications.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Modules, input forms and applications are only read via the user interface. If the form of presentation is changed even marginally during an application update, errors can arise in the execution of the process. A high error rate can occur, particularly in web-based application systems that are characterized by design and display changes. It is also unclear to what extent the accuracy of the automated processes should be checked and where the responsibility for this lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A changed arrangement of buttons or a new menu entry on portals such as Amazon is difficult to control. Furthermore, in the context of automation, the surface-based automation approach results in a low data throughput rate when compared to decoupled interfaces. The process steps and inputs always depend on the interface. This severely limits the scalability of possible applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So which process is right for RPA? <\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Although the implementation of bots can lead to impressive results, Robotic Process Automation does not meet the requirement of being able to automate highly complex processes end-to-end and can thus only partially contribute to a complete automation of such processes. Companies run the risk of selecting unsuitable processes for bot automation due to unrealistic expectations. Therefore, selecting the right processes can be considered the biggest challenge of RPA automation. The following characteristics can be used as criteria for selecting a suitable RPA process [6]:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Strongly rule-based processes<\/em>: RPA requires a prescribed rule for each eventuality, and this rule must be unambiguously clear. The decision logic of the selected process must be logic-based and and almost completely predictable for all cases.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Repetitive tasks<\/em>: Adequate transaction volume helps maximize the benefits derived from implementing software bots in an organization. Generally, routine and repetitive tasks constitute an ideal choice for automation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Process maturity<\/em>: Established processes that are stable and understood by all process participants are suitable for RPA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Structured and digital input data<\/em>: All input data must be digital and in a well-structured format.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Transaction-oriented tasks<\/em>: RPA is suitable for transactional tasks that are performed by humans and can be replaced by software robots. In particular, transaction errors (e.g. incorrect data) can be reduced, and many transactional activities can be carried out at once.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Degree of standardization<\/em>: Processes with a high degree of standardization are best suited for the application of RPA. The more complex a process, the more complex it will be to implement using RPA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Few exceptional cases<\/em>: Processes designed for RPA should not have to deal with exceptional cases. The more special rules are handled by bots, the likelier it is that process automation and optimization efforts are delayed or canceled. In this case, increased manual intervention is also necessary.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Process documentation<\/em>: Process descriptions are essential to teach bots specific keystroke and click sequence behaviors. If processes are well documented, bot implementation will be more successful.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Number of systems in the process<\/em>: There is great potential for the use of RPA in processes that extend across multiple systems and have grown unnecessarily complex or time-consuming due to media disruptions. Accordingly, the requirements must then be met by all systems involved. The strength of RPA lies in its usefulness as a bridging technology.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
What can RPA do in the context of ERP systems? <\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Companies often use outdated, monolithic ERP systems. Programming interfaces to connect to modern digital applications or switch to a modern, open and service-oriented ERP system is a task that often exceeds the budget of the IT departments. In this case, Robotic Process Automation offers a way out of the dilemma and automates or accelerates processes without interfering with or changing the existing ERP systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- RPA as an integrator<\/em>: If an ERP system does not offer an interface for an existing problem, content can be exchanged with a third-party system via GUI remote control (RPA) [1]. Reasons for a lack of interface could be an outdated technology platform or a lack of development resources.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- RPA to improve ergonomics<\/em>: A lack of usability due to outdated systems and synchronization with third-party systems can in many cases obstruct productivity. However, people often stick with such systems because the costs and effort involved in changing systems outweigh any expected gains in processing speed. This is where RPA can offer a short-term solution by compen\u00adsating for the deficits in the installed base [1].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- RPA as a testing tool<\/em>: New release and version changes in ERP systems are based on a test phase lasting several weeks, in which a copy of the available productive data is used to check whether the new system works correctly for the specified requirements. However, by using RPA, test guides with click sequences can be created, which can then replace special testing software at this point [1].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- RPA as a bridge between the real and digital world<\/em>: Processes based on (paper) forms can be ideally automated in the ERP system using RPA. Particularly when forms involve structured data, RPA can be used to extract, interpret and assign said data to one or more business processes in the ERP system. In the case of paper documents, they are first scanned and then converted into a machine-readable form via OCR technology. [1]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Conclusion and outlook <\/h2>\n\n\n\n
As long as rigid and monolithic IT and ERP systems are in operational use at companies, Robotic Process Automation can be used as a solution to compensate for openness and flexibility deficits in the installed base. The user gains short-term flexibility, but the problems of the existing systems are only shifted elsewhere, rather than solved. RPA is suitable for automating repetitive and standardized processes. However, the most important prerequisite here is the availability of well-structured and digitalized data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In many practical applications, however, this structure is missing. The best example of this is emails, which have digital content but are generally unstructured. This means that the combination of RPA with other cognitive components \u2013 such as an OCR component \u2013 offers significantly greater automation potential than the possible further development of Robotic Process Automation itself into a cognitive solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The potential of Robotic Process Automation for long-term process improvement should be seen as severely limited. The automation of processes and bridging front-end media disruptions results in a variety of dependencies and conditions, which have been summarized in this article. The path to a future-proof enterprise architecture (and the processes and systems that comprise it) requires open, adaptable systems with modern architecture, which are characterized by a high level of interoperability between various system levels. This ensures that interaction and coupling with other systems, as well as the automation of processes, are sustainably supported.<\/p>\n
Bibliography <\/h2>[1] Bitkom e.V. (2020). ERP und Robotic Process Automation (RPA) \u2013 Eine Einordnung.\r
[2] Gartner (2019). Gartner Says Worldwide Robotic Process Automation Software Market Grew 63% in 2018. URL: www.gartner.com\/en\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2019-06-24-gartner-says-worldwide-robotic-process-automation-sof.\r
[3] Bitkom e.V. (2019). Robotic Process Automation (RPA) im digitalen B\u00fcro. Ein Leitfaden f\u00fcr Anwender.\r
[4] Aguirre, S.; Rodriguez, A.: (2017). Automation of a Business Process Using Robotic Process Automation (RPA): A Case Study. 4th Workshop on Engineering Applications, WEA 2017 Cartagena, Colombia, September 27, 2017 Proceedings.\r
[5] Langmann, C.; Turi, D.: (2020). Robotic Process Automation (RPA) \u2013Digitalisierung und Automatisierung von Prozessen. Voraussetzungen, Funktionsweise und Implementierung am Beispiel des Controllings und Rechnungswesens. Springer Gabler.\r
[6] Syed, R.; Suriadi, S.; Adams, M.; Bandara, W.; Leemans, S.; Ouyang, C.; Ter, A.; Van de Weerd, I.; Wynn, M.; Reijers, H.: (2020). Robotic Process Automation: Contemporary themes and challenges. In: Computers in Industry: Vol. 115.\r
[7] Asquith, A.; Horsman, G.: (2019). Let the robots do it! \u2013 Taking a look at Robotic Process Automation and its potential application in digital forensics. In: Forensic Science International: Reports: Vol. 1.\r
[8] Willcocks, L. P.; Lacity, M.; Craig, A.: (2015). The IT function and robotic process automation. The Outsourcing Unit Working Paper Series (15\/05). The London School of Economics and Political.<\/div>Your downloads<\/h2>
- RPA to improve ergonomics<\/em>: A lack of usability due to outdated systems and synchronization with third-party systems can in many cases obstruct productivity. However, people often stick with such systems because the costs and effort involved in changing systems outweigh any expected gains in processing speed. This is where RPA can offer a short-term solution by compen\u00adsating for the deficits in the installed base [1].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Repetitive tasks<\/em>: Adequate transaction volume helps maximize the benefits derived from implementing software bots in an organization. Generally, routine and repetitive tasks constitute an ideal choice for automation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n